Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 18, 2019, 05:57:07 am
News: 2020 U.S. Senate Predictions are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IPFW-IN: Clinton +13
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: IPFW-IN: Clinton +13  (Read 2110 times)
Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,818
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 28, 2016, 12:40:34 pm »

Clinton: 54
Sanders: 41

University pollster, but their polling of the race in 2008 was pretty good.

http://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/local-politics/IPFW-poll--Hoosiers-like-Clinton-12787113
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2016, 12:45:11 pm »

Clinton: 54
Sanders: 41

University pollster, but their polling of the race in 2008 was pretty good.

http://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/local-politics/IPFW-poll--Hoosiers-like-Clinton-12787113

I think it's a single digit Clinton lead but they did get the polling right 8 years ago. Keep in mind Indiana Democrats are more moderate than Wisconsin Democrats
Logged
Classic Conservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,642
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2016, 12:59:20 pm »

Do we have any GOP numbers.
Logged
Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,818
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2016, 01:03:53 pm »

I don't think so.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,377
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2016, 01:29:04 pm »

I find it curious that Clinton hasn't campaigned at all two days and hasn't spent a dime in ads in the upcoming states.
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,768
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2016, 01:30:42 pm »

I find it curious that Clinton hasn't campaigned at all two days and hasn't spent a dime in ads in the upcoming states.

Why bother? No need to waste millions anymore.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,377
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2016, 01:36:31 pm »

I find it curious that Clinton hasn't campaigned at all two days and hasn't spent a dime in ads in the upcoming states.

Why bother? No need to waste millions anymore.

Well, a win in Indiana which is supposedly Sanders-friendly territory would be the nail in the coffin and prevent an embarrassing string of defeats in May that may lead to new breathless media narratives about how weak she is.   
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,361
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.16, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2016, 01:39:41 pm »

I find it curious that Clinton hasn't campaigned at all two days and hasn't spent a dime in ads in the upcoming states.

Why bother? No need to waste millions anymore.

Well, a win in Indiana which is supposedly Sanders-friendly territory would be the nail in the coffin and prevent an embarrassing string of defeats in May that may lead to new breathless media narratives about how weak she is.   

What part of 475 delegates in California don't you understand?!?!?!?!! Bernie's down by only about 300 right now!

Tongue
Logged
BundouYMB
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 914


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2016, 02:08:12 pm »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'd love to see this type of polling in other states, although I imagine you'd get similar responses pretty much everywhere (bar a few exceptions -- I imagine voters in Vermont would list positive things about Sanders as driving their votes, for example.)
Logged
standwrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 593
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.55, S: -2.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2016, 03:50:48 pm »

tbh Sanders isn't really trying in IN or at all now. IN should be going for Sanders rn
Logged
Still couldn't quell the Bel
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,441
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2016, 04:29:14 pm »

I could buy Clinton winning Indiana, but I seriously doubt it'll be a double-digit win.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,455
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2016, 04:34:49 pm »

I could buy Clinton winning Indiana, but I seriously doubt it'll be a double-digit win.
I'm not so skeptical.  Ohio and Pennsylvania were both double digit wins in which Clinton won the white vote and did well in rural counties.  Maybe whatever appeal Clinton has in those states carries over to Indiana?
Logged
Still couldn't quell the Bel
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,441
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2016, 04:49:36 pm »

I could buy Clinton winning Indiana, but I seriously doubt it'll be a double-digit win.
I'm not so skeptical.  Ohio and Pennsylvania were both double digit wins in which Clinton won the white vote and did well in rural counties.  Maybe whatever appeal Clinton has in those states carries over to Indiana?

Keep in mind that PA was closed. I'm still not sure why Sanders tanked so much in OH, and that should be a concern for him in Indiana. At the same time, the demographics are more similar to Missouri, which was a true nail-biter, and Clinton hasn't done very well in the Chicago area (in IL or WI), and she needs Lake to come in big for her if she's going to win. Rural IL and MI were pretty strong for Sanders, so I'm not sure we should only be looking to OH and PA for clues about how IN will vote.
Logged
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 42,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2016, 06:00:07 pm »

I find it curious that Clinton hasn't campaigned at all two days and hasn't spent a dime in ads in the upcoming states.

Why bother? No need to waste millions anymore.

Well, a win in Indiana which is supposedly Sanders-friendly territory would be the nail in the coffin and prevent an embarrassing string of defeats in May that may lead to new breathless media narratives about how weak she is.   

She's going to lose certain states like Oregon no matter what.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,377
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2016, 06:05:51 pm »

I find it curious that Clinton hasn't campaigned at all two days and hasn't spent a dime in ads in the upcoming states.

Why bother? No need to waste millions anymore.

Well, a win in Indiana which is supposedly Sanders-friendly territory would be the nail in the coffin and prevent an embarrassing string of defeats in May that may lead to new breathless media narratives about how weak she is.   

She's going to lose certain states like Oregon no matter what.

Yes, I know that. But if she notches up a victory in the biggest state that votes in May then the narrative will be completely different than losing 4 straight.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,515
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 29, 2016, 02:29:14 am »

I could buy Clinton winning Indiana, but I seriously doubt it'll be a double-digit win.
I'm not so skeptical.  Ohio and Pennsylvania were both double digit wins in which Clinton won the white vote and did well in rural counties.  Maybe whatever appeal Clinton has in those states carries over to Indiana?

Keep in mind that PA was closed. I'm still not sure why Sanders tanked so much in OH, and that should be a concern for him in Indiana. At the same time, the demographics are more similar to Missouri, which was a true nail-biter, and Clinton hasn't done very well in the Chicago area (in IL or WI), and she needs Lake to come in big for her if she's going to win. Rural IL and MI were pretty strong for Sanders, so I'm not sure we should only be looking to OH and PA for clues about how IN will vote.

Lake and Marion are key... Clinton won whites 61-39 and Obama won AA voters 92-8... I don't think Sanders will do that well with whites and I don't think Clinton will do that well with AA voters.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC