NM - BWD Global: Clinton +25
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 04:40:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  NM - BWD Global: Clinton +25
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: NM - BWD Global: Clinton +25  (Read 5501 times)
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 03, 2016, 10:06:31 AM »

https://www.scribd.com/doc/314323239/DEM-PREZ-MEMO-pdf
(I hate giving a scribd link but its all I can find)
New Mexico Dem Primary LV:
Clinton - 53.3%
Sanders - 27.6%
Undecideds - 19.0%

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2016, 10:14:55 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is pretty funny. Bernie doing best among conservatives and worst among liberals, but respectably among progressives. I wonder what makes Bernie supporters so much more inclined to identify as progressive rather than liberal. Is it in age thing?
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2016, 10:27:25 AM »

unless I just happen to know every Sanders support in the state personally, this is junk. not going to be this lopside.
Logged
A Perez
Rookie
**
Posts: 231
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2016, 10:37:28 AM »

Land-line only.
Junk poll.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2016, 10:40:57 AM »

unless I just happen to know every Sanders support in the state personally, this is junk. not going to be this lopside.

Let's not go down this route. "Everyone I know voted for Bernie!1!!" is how Reddit justifies their fraud accusations. If PA was based on who I knew, Bernie would've won by 50 points. His supporters are more vocal and also more likely to spread their opinion far and wide through technology.

That said, I do agree she's not winning by 25. I think it'll be similar to AZ.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2016, 11:03:52 AM »

lol, Bernie losing among progressives. Clinton should easily win here, but not by this much.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2016, 11:14:58 AM »

Nice. Gonna make a lot of money shorting the New Mexico margin >15 market on PredictIt after this one!
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2016, 11:29:04 AM »

Despicable lies! We all know that Bernie will win 95%-5%.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2016, 11:47:36 AM »

Looks pretty junkified.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2016, 02:08:20 PM »

Clinton leads 61%-21% among Hispanics. Could NM be his worst state on Tuesday?

No, its probably going be NJ.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2016, 03:20:53 PM »

No way will she win by that much in New Mexico.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,418
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2016, 06:34:36 PM »

The margins seem to be extremely sketchy, I can't see New Mexico going for Hillary by significantly larger margins than Arizona, and quite likely could be significantly closer, considering much lower percentage of 65+ voters and much higher proportion of voters <35 in a primary where generational divide is most regions of the country has been an even larger factor than ethnicity/income.

It is easy to look at the "% of Latinos" in a given state and then automatically start to assign a % of the vote to candidate X or Candidate Y, however the reality is that in New Mexico almost 10% of the population identifies as "Spanish" in origin, with hundreds of years of roots in the region, and there is even a separate Castilian Spanish dialect at home, so there really isn't any reasonable comparison that one could make based upon similar counties/regions, etc...

Now, one item that could prove interesting is the Native American vote in a state where 10% of the population is Native American.... No idea how this will play out in NM, but it is worth noting that Hillary exceeded her statewide averages in Navajo and Apacha counties in NM, which also include the Navajo, Apache, and Hopi Nations. Although we don't have tons of data to look at regarding the Native Nations (MT and SD have yet to vote on Tuesday) Bernie looks to have won the Ojibwe/Chippewa in the Upper-Midwest, as well as indigenous communities in Alaska, and although we don't have much precinct level data from Oregon, quite possibly Warm Springs and people of Native background in Klamath County, Oregon.

Point being, New Mexico is a state that is so fundamentally different demographically from anywhere else in the United States, that I think unless there is another poll or two coming down before Tuesday, no one has any idea how this will all shake down.







Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2016, 12:50:58 AM »

Epic fail.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2016, 02:13:27 AM »


I never bought this as a big win - this was one state where age beat out race in 2008, and while I didn't expect this narrow a result, these predictions of 15%+ blowouts were kind of baseless.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2016, 02:41:10 AM »

This was really the anomaly of the night. I guess age really made the difference.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 08, 2016, 03:24:02 AM »

This was really the anomaly of the night. I guess age really made the difference.

Mhmm. She really outperformed everywhere but here, which is really interesting considering it's closed and heavily Hispanic. Ah well.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,624
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2016, 04:03:33 AM »

Unfortunately without exit polls we will never know what happened.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 08, 2016, 09:47:34 AM »

NM was...quite a surprise considering how the rest of the night went. If you would've told me yesterday that she'd win SD, possibly win CA by double digits, win NJ by nearly 30, and keep MT within single digits, I'd have guessed NM was a 20+ point blowout.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 08, 2016, 09:53:49 AM »

Unfortunately without exit polls we will never know what happened.

Really sad. I would love to see some California exit polling too.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 08, 2016, 09:58:24 AM »

NM was the NC of last Tuesday.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 08, 2016, 12:12:12 PM »

Amazing job, BWD Global ...
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,580
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 08, 2016, 12:32:06 PM »

Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 09, 2016, 09:51:00 AM »

This was really the anomaly of the night. I guess age really made the difference.

Mhmm. She really outperformed everywhere but here, which is really interesting considering it's closed and heavily Hispanic. Ah well.

Well everywhere but here and North Dakota anyway...
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 09, 2016, 10:35:02 AM »

I feel like Clinton did as expected in North Dakota. Sanders kind of underperformed, because 10% went uncommitted. I wonder why? Could the fact that it was an open primary and the Republicans didn't really hold a public contest (just a convention) lead some Republicans to attend the Democratic caucus and just vote for neither of the two? Sounds unlikely but you never know.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 09, 2016, 10:42:43 AM »

Albuquerque surprised me. Is New Mexico the only state where a major urban area supported Sanders more than the rural and outstanding areas of the state?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 14 queries.