Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:59:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 67043 times)
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« on: June 07, 2016, 09:26:20 AM »

Just got home from voting. Very quick and easy although one of the machines was broken. There was a lady(seemed about 30) ahead of me who hadnt realized she was still a registered Republican and was trying to figure out how she would be able to vote democrat. She was still there when i left, hope she atleast voted.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2016, 11:07:21 AM »


Benchmark is reporting low turnout in Berkeley, but schools out so that's not surprising.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2016, 05:32:00 PM »

https://public.tableau.com/profile/paulmitche11#!/vizhome/CapitolWeeklyDemPresidentialPrimaryAVExitPoll/USDEMPRIM

An exit poll of 16,000 respondents conducted in CA shows that Clinton slightly leads Sanders by 8 points (54-46) among absentee voters who voted by mail sometime before June 4th. And according to a Field estimate, over 60% of these absentee voters will make up the electorate in tonight's primary.

Interestingly enough, Clinton is tied with Sanders among early Latino voters at 50-50. I expected it to be close in CA considering Latino voters here are disproportionately younger.

Overall, it's looking more and more like a tight race. Back in 2008, Hillary was ahead in absentee voting exit polls by 23 points in CA.

Wow, she might actually lose.

Doubt it. Its looking like same day turnout hasnt been that strong.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2016, 05:55:02 PM »

https://public.tableau.com/profile/paulmitche11#!/vizhome/CapitolWeeklyDemPresidentialPrimaryAVExitPoll/USDEMPRIM

An exit poll of 16,000 respondents conducted in CA shows that Clinton slightly leads Sanders by 8 points (54-46) among absentee voters who voted by mail sometime before June 4th. And according to a Field estimate, over 60% of these absentee voters will make up the electorate in tonight's primary.

Interestingly enough, Clinton is tied with Sanders among early Latino voters at 50-50. I expected it to be close in CA considering Latino voters here are disproportionately younger.

Overall, it's looking more and more like a tight race. Back in 2008, Hillary was ahead in absentee voting exit polls by 23 points in CA.

Wow, she might actually lose.

Doubt it. Its looking like same day turnout hasnt been that strong.

Well the problem is that if the election is anywhere close, there's a good chance that we won't know for a few days or even possibly longer. I think California allows all ballots received through the mail by Thursday (Or is it Friday?) to be counted. In a heavily VbM state, this means that there is a large number of individuals that wait until the day of the election and then put their ballots in the mailbox...

I love vote-by-mail, but find it extremely frustrating when it comes to the pace of vote counting.... I think Oregon has "final" but non certified numbers and our election was three weeks ago!

I dont think California is getting called anytime soon, Im not sure if that's good or bad for either candidate.

Merkley was just on MSNBC saying the winner of the pledged delegates/popular vote is the nominee, and that superdelegates should be abolished.

He's a good democrat, and young. He has no plans to burn bridges, especially with Obama endorsing soon.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2016, 05:57:02 PM »

If Hillary really is only leading the early vote by 8, that does give me pause. She probably still wins, but it could be quite tight.

Its actually 9 points.......yeah your point still stands.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2016, 06:04:35 PM »

If Hillary really is only leading the early vote by 8, that does give me pause. She probably still wins, but it could be quite tight.

Its actually 9 points.......yeah your point still stands.

It's actually 7.4% unless they adjusted within the past hour (7,575 Bernie- 8,770 based upon the Noon Update)  but they "weigh the polls" to adjust for Demographics, whatever the "F" that means. Wink

Unrelated, but I feel like an email poll would favor Sanders, dont you think?
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2016, 06:42:14 PM »

CNN merged Bergen County and Hudson County, can't say I'm too pleased.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2016, 06:43:12 PM »

Sanders will do well in the college areas (Rutgers-New Brunswick, Rutgers-Newark)

There not in session right now though which means turnout there shouldn't be that high.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2016, 06:55:26 PM »

CNN merged Bergen County and Hudson County, can't say I'm too pleased.
That's unfortunate. I'd like to see how my county votes and it should be pretty different from Bergen county.

So if you hover your cursor in the right place, there's a little sliver that shows up as Hudson county. They really do need to fix it though. It might be a small county geographically, but its not tiny in terms of population.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2016, 07:04:58 PM »

NYT graphics make it look like SD polls have closed. Is this the case?

A portion of South Dakota.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2016, 07:06:12 PM »

Benchmark calls NJ for Clinton? How?
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #11 on: June 07, 2016, 07:08:40 PM »

Fox calls it for Clinton?

HOW R THEY CALLING IT WITH NO RESULTS!?
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #12 on: June 07, 2016, 07:35:36 PM »

NJ will probably be called once we get Essex. The only question is the margin.

Fox has already called it apparently.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #13 on: June 07, 2016, 07:38:55 PM »

If decision desk is accurate and that Essex drop they just got is right, Hillary will be getting a big bump soon.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2016, 07:47:25 PM »

Passaic County has Paterson, and Essex has Newark.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2016, 07:57:59 PM »

So, Sanders ain't winning a county huh?

I think he has a chance in Hunterdon County.

Edit: Nope, probably not. It was closer last time I checked.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2016, 08:21:20 PM »


*GASP*
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2016, 08:38:41 PM »

Hillary starting to run away with NJ.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #18 on: June 07, 2016, 08:50:53 PM »

Benchmark deserves some accolades for NJ.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #19 on: June 07, 2016, 08:54:17 PM »

If Sanders loses Montana and Clinton wins 5 out of six states, will Sanders drop out?

I think Sanders only cares about California tonight.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2016, 09:07:26 PM »

If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.

Clinton barely won New Mexico in 08.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #21 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:04 PM »

I don't understand ...
How can Sanders win N.D. by such a huge margin, but yet Hillary is currently leading in S.D. ?
Strange.
What am I missing ?

Ones a caucus, ones a primary.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #22 on: June 08, 2016, 12:43:52 AM »

The percentage is going down but Hillary seems to have a solid 400,000 vote lead in Cali.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2016, 01:12:05 AM »

Uh... you guys do realize that Clinton didn't drop out on the last day of the primaries in 2008 either right? (Technically this isn't even the last day of the primaries.)

Do you think he's meeting with Obama on Thursday just to flip him the bird or something? Get a grip, folks. It takes a few days to sort these things out sometimes.

Yep, he hopefully knows what hes doing. The fact that he didnt attack Clinton was a positive sign.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #24 on: June 08, 2016, 01:32:38 AM »

Is San Francisco really nearly all in? Hillary is winning it by double digits...

Not unless somehow total votes dropped from 250k in '08 to 150k in '16.

Voter turnout is likely down across the state.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.