CA-USC/LA Times: Clinton +30 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 06:56:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CA-USC/LA Times: Clinton +30 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA-USC/LA Times: Clinton +30  (Read 2455 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: June 13, 2016, 12:12:08 PM »

If Trump is seriously losing California by 30, he's not winning the election. There's no way his support can be so selective that he does this badly in the dark blue states, and yet somehow win light blue states like Pennsylvania.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2016, 03:48:42 PM »

If Trump is seriously losing California by 30, he's not winning the election. There's no way his support can be so selective that he does this badly in the dark blue states, and yet somehow win light blue states like Pennsylvania.

He is completely different from any past Republican candidate in the past 40 years or more.

We should expect his support to be more selective.


Not so selective that he'd lose a state like California, where many demographic groups are well represented, by thirty points (seven points worse than Romney) and yet do significantly better than Romney in all of the right places. The fact that he's "different" doesn't mean that the results will be that convenient for him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.