CBS National Poll: Clinton +6
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 04:44:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CBS National Poll: Clinton +6
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CBS National Poll: Clinton +6  (Read 1629 times)
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 15, 2016, 06:00:58 PM »
« edited: June 15, 2016, 06:05:14 PM by Castro »





http://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-maintains-lead-after-claiming-nomination-cbs-news-poll/
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2016, 06:03:57 PM »

Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2016, 06:17:56 PM »

Junky crosstabs, but looks like Democrats are more united than Republicans...

If Clinton leads among college whites by as much as Trump leads among non college whites, I feel like she'd be leading nationally by a lot more than 6.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,536
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2016, 06:25:33 PM »

Junky crosstabs, but looks like Democrats are more united than Republicans...

If Clinton leads among college whites by as much as Trump leads among non college whites, I feel like she'd be leading nationally by a lot more than 6.
Yeah, plugging some of these numbers into the 538 Calculator, she would be up like 7 or 8 with those numbers.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,238
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2016, 06:28:18 PM »

If Hillary is actually winning by 20+ among college-educated whites, November 8th is gonna be a sad day for Republicans.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2016, 06:34:40 PM »

If Hillary is actually winning by 20+ among college-educated whites, November 8th is gonna be a sad day for Republicans.

Didn't Romney win this demographic?
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2016, 06:42:28 PM »

If Hillary is winning college educated whites by 20 points she's up double digits when her advantages with minority voters (and Trump's colossal disadvantages) are taken into account. CBS sampled a larger # of non-college educated whites to get Clinton +6
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,624
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2016, 06:43:05 PM »

If Hillary is actually winning by 20+ among college-educated whites, November 8th is gonna be a sad day for Republicans.

Didn't Romney win this demographic?

Yes.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2016, 06:43:21 PM »

Clinton up 8 with white women!
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2016, 06:50:32 PM »

Clinton should definitely be winning by more than 6 points overall if she's only losing white voters by 6 points.  I also don't see numbers for Latino voters in the crosstabs.  Do they not have separate categories for Non-Hispanic White and Latinos, and that's helping her numbers with whites?  Or is this just an example of funky sub-samples?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2016, 07:18:16 PM »

I love the "honest and trustworthy" numbers for both of them.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,625
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2016, 09:22:46 PM »

Love that both candidates have lost support since February. Exactly what they deserve.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2016, 10:13:33 PM »

Clinton should definitely be winning by more than 6 points overall if she's only losing white voters by 6 points.  I also don't see numbers for Latino voters in the crosstabs.  Do they not have separate categories for Non-Hispanic White and Latinos, and that's helping her numbers with whites?  Or is this just an example of funky sub-samples?

My question as well.
Logged
Reginald
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 802
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2016, 11:45:36 PM »

The CBS poll last month (though it was shared with NYT) had the same margin, but much lower undecideds. Trump was winning whites by 12 and was at 85% with Republicans in that poll.
Logged
Desroko
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 346
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 16, 2016, 01:15:13 AM »

The numbers that really matter:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,624
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2016, 04:00:46 AM »

The numbers that really matter:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yep. At least here in my neighborhood this has always been the most accurately predictive part of the polls, regardless of their topline numbers. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.