1002 - Signed into Law (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:24:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  1002 - Signed into Law (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1002 - Signed into Law  (Read 2061 times)
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« on: June 18, 2016, 02:08:11 PM »
« edited: August 03, 2016, 02:20:07 PM by Speaker Kent »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsors: Rep. DKrolga (L-MA) and Rep. Classic Conservative (F-TX)
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2016, 02:20:26 PM »

There are several differences between the bill I introduced in the House Introduction thread and the one that Classic Conservative introduced in the Senate thread. I ask that they be treated as separate bills.
I understand that. I've read through both, and I noticed the differences.

However, after you posted this, Classic Conservative announced his intention to co-sponsor this one. I expect him to withdraw his other bill.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2016, 01:29:20 PM »

Is there any more debate to be had?
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2016, 11:44:07 AM »

The GM is supposed to be as impartial as possible, so I don't think it should be too politicized. Having the position go through both Houses increases that chance. I support having only the House confirm them.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2016, 02:42:12 PM »

On second thought, I've changed my mind: the GM is supposed to be impartial and apolitical, and the Senate is generally more stable than the House, so having the Senate confirm the GM makes more sense.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2016, 09:42:26 PM »
« Edited: June 27, 2016, 09:44:25 PM by Speaker Kent »

Mr. Truman is right. I will extend the period of debate for another 24 hours. I also propose an amendment addressing his concerns:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It goes further than his suggestion, but this should make the GM a little harder to remove.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2016, 11:02:59 PM »

Seeing as how there has been no debate, we will now move to a 72-hour vote on my amendment. Representatives may vote AYE, NAY, or ABSTAIN.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2016, 02:05:11 PM »

AYE
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2016, 05:38:01 PM »

The bill now has enough votes to pass.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2016, 11:09:28 AM »

Representatives have 72 hours to vote on the revised version. I will accept Rep. DKrol's vote.

AYE
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2016, 01:00:52 PM »

This bill now has enough votes to pass. Representatives still have 70 hours to add or change their vote.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2016, 04:43:06 PM »

This bill has enough votes to pass. The vote is now closed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.