Clinton lead falls to 3% in NBC/SurveyMonkey National Poll (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:15:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Clinton lead falls to 3% in NBC/SurveyMonkey National Poll (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton lead falls to 3% in NBC/SurveyMonkey National Poll  (Read 2413 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: July 05, 2016, 03:59:25 PM »
« edited: July 05, 2016, 04:02:04 PM by IceSpear »

Just 3?! lol

Also:

Kasich 50
Clinton 42

Ryan 47
Clinton 45

Romney 45
Clinton 45

If Clinton wins this, she can thank Republican primary voters.

Those matchups are irrelevant since those people haven't put themselves through the meat grinder of a campaign, so those are actually very pitiful numbers for Ryan and Romney. I do agree she would've been the underdog against Kasich.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2016, 04:30:03 PM »

Just 3?! lol

Also:

Kasich 50
Clinton 42

Ryan 47
Clinton 45

Romney 45
Clinton 45

If Clinton wins this, she can thank Republican primary voters.

Those matchups are irrelevant since those people haven't put themselves through the meat grinder of a campaign, so those are actually very pitiful numbers for Ryan and Romney. I do agree she would've been the underdog against Kasich.

Well, IceSpear, I don't agree even that. Kasich was largely unknown and he would also have been demonized by the Democratic smear machine, if he had become the nominee. And being low energy, bland and unremarkable, he would certainly have not been immune to such attacks.

He would've been attacked, but he also would've had his reputation as a moderate hero, sane and reasonable Republican, etc. to fall back on. The media also would've heavily backed him over Hillary, as opposed to now where they're backing Hillary reluctantly. His numbers and favorability definitely would've fallen, but I think he'd have a modest edge now, around the same size as the one Hillary currently has. He wouldn't be a lock or anything, just like Hillary is not a lock now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.