NV-Monmouth: Heck+2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 05:41:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  NV-Monmouth: Heck+2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NV-Monmouth: Heck+2  (Read 1787 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: July 11, 2016, 04:33:05 PM »

Dems can't afford to take this race for granted, that's for sure.

http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_NV_071116/

Among Whites: Heck +12 (47-35)   vs. Trump +12 (49-37)
Among Non-Whites: Masto +20 (49-29) vs. Clinton +41 (64-23)

66% White 
11% Black 
15% Hispanic
  8% Other 

Considering that even that terrible human being Shelley freaking Berkley almost won here in 2012, it's probably still a difficult race for the GOP to win.
VanDerBeek is not running a far-right campaign to get 5% this time.

Nobody knew who VanDerBeek was, much less his ideology. Romney and Heller got nearly the same share of the vote. VDB and "None of the Above" were mostly protest votes from Obama voters who couldn't stomach Berkley. Any competent Democrat would've won that race with room to spare, as Heller demonstrated little to no crossover appeal.

Heck, on the other hand, has demonstrated some crossover appeal in his swing district, so he'll be a tougher nut to crack. But CCM Purple heart is also a much better candidate than Berkley, and Heck will have to deal with Trump.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.