MO-PPP: Blunt in big trouble; only 3 points ahead of Kander
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:57:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-PPP: Blunt in big trouble; only 3 points ahead of Kander
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-PPP: Blunt in big trouble; only 3 points ahead of Kander  (Read 2322 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 15, 2016, 10:14:07 AM »
« edited: July 15, 2016, 10:26:30 AM by TN volunteer »

Roy Blunt (R, inc.): 41%
Jason Kander (D): 38%

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/07/trump-leads-in-missouri-senate-race-gives-dems-opportunity.html
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2016, 10:16:38 AM »

Which means he's running 7 points behind Trump... I think he'll still pull it out but this has potential to be a sleeper race.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2016, 10:17:21 AM »

Looks like my prediction was pretty close. If Blunt really is underperforming Trump by 7, that is problematic for him.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2016, 10:24:14 AM »

Always said that this race is a Tossup. Blunt is more likely to lose than Toomey.

I wouldn't go that far, but the fact that Republicans want to put money here, coupled with small leads for Blunt does give me pause. Maybe Lean R is more fitting than Likely R, at this point.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2016, 10:27:44 AM »

Big trouble? PPP had Blunt +5 last year. Meh.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,953


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2016, 10:28:21 AM »

Blunt is the embodiment of the Washington establishment.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,750
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2016, 10:33:25 AM »

Kander's a surprisingly good recruit. He really is Blunt's antithesis. Young, proud war vet, not a career politician. If he can hammer that to a large audience in his ads and in the debates, he might have a chance.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2016, 11:00:04 AM »

Kander is a good candidate, but I highly doubt he wins. It looks like undecideds will break for Blunt as he shores up Republican support. I'm very surprised he didn't have a serious primary challenge this year.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,513
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2016, 11:09:24 AM »

Blunt is going to win. Mcginty is going to win too.
Logged
Bismarck
Chancellor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,357


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2016, 11:20:14 AM »

Blunt will win. Missouri is too R now and even if not Trump will save him.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2016, 11:47:37 AM »

Blunt will win. Missouri is too R now and even if not Trump will save him.
Agree. Republicans will come home to him. I wish they polled McCaskill vs. Wagner, but McCaskill's approval numbers are low, she's in trouble.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2016, 12:43:17 PM »

Blunt will win. Missouri is too R now and even if not Trump will save him.
Agree. Republicans will come home to him. I wish they polled McCaskill vs. Wagner, but McCaskill's approval numbers are low, she's in trouble.
They're not notably lower than the approval ratings PPP finds for nearly any other politician. Blunt's are worse.
Logged
syntaxerror
Rookie
**
Posts: 127


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2016, 01:37:25 PM »

If the DSCC was willing to put money into this race then Kander would have a shot.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2016, 03:50:48 PM »

'big trouble'? Nah, Johnson is in big trouble, Blunt just looks like he's in a tougher fight than expected.

Regardless even though its one poll him significantly under performing Trump is enough concern for this race to be considered a Lean R race.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2016, 04:28:10 PM »

Great news!
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2016, 10:06:35 PM »

lol @ Trump/Kander voters.
Logged
syntaxerror
Rookie
**
Posts: 127


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 15, 2016, 11:57:23 PM »


Anti-establishment vote, maybe.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 16, 2016, 12:36:56 AM »

^ Well, Kander was winning some 60% Romney counties when he won his SOS race in 2012.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 16, 2016, 12:44:05 AM »

^ Well, Kander was winning some 60% Romney counties when he won his SOS race in 2012.
The Libertarian and Constitution Party candidates combined got 3.7% of the vote, and Kander only won with a plurality. State-level races are far less partisan than federal races. My guess is the results of the poll have to do with undecideds. I think Blunt wins this narrowly in the end.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 13 queries.