CBS/YouGov: Clinton and Trump close in IA/OH/MI
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 08:30:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CBS/YouGov: Clinton and Trump close in IA/OH/MI
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: CBS/YouGov: Clinton and Trump close in IA/OH/MI  (Read 3546 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 17, 2016, 09:37:28 AM »



https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/07/17/clinton-trump-neck-and-neck-key-battlegrounds/
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2016, 09:39:23 AM »

The Michigan poll is junk, Clinton has a wider lead there

Ohio finally looks a little encouraging

Iowa looks like a tough one for Team Blue because every poll is in the margin of error there so they all can't be wrong
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,293
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2016, 09:50:20 AM »

Overall battlegrounds poll is terrible for Clinton. Only 41-40 up when including such states as WI and MI. Infact, she should be tied or ahead in every one of those battleground states except NC.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,478
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2016, 09:51:19 AM »

Lol at Ohio being to the left of Michigan.

Michigan polling is almost always awful.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,478
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2016, 09:55:46 AM »

Overall battlegrounds poll is terrible for Clinton. Only 41-40 up when including such states as WI and MI. Infact, she should be tied or ahead in every one of those battleground states except NC.

NBC has her up 8 in a group of 13 battleground states.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2016, 09:57:25 AM »

The Michigan poll is junk, Clinton has a wider lead there

Ohio finally looks a little encouraging

Iowa looks like a tough one for Team Blue because every poll is in the margin of error there so they all can't be wrong

If I'm remembering right, Iowa polling in 2012 was also quite close. Obama still won it by 6.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2016, 10:00:13 AM »

The Michigan poll is junk, Clinton has a wider lead there

Ohio finally looks a little encouraging

Iowa looks like a tough one for Team Blue because every poll is in the margin of error there so they all can't be wrong

If I'm remembering right, Iowa polling in 2012 was also quite close. Obama still won it by 6.

Iowa polling in 2014 was also quite close. Ernst still won it by 8.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2016, 10:00:21 AM »

Overall battlegrounds poll is terrible for Clinton. Only 41-40 up when including such states as WI and MI. Infact, she should be tied or ahead in every one of those battleground states except NC.

NBC has her up 8 in a group of 13 battleground states.

You realize that this is part of a national poll of 1000 RV ?

So, not more than 100-200 people were polled for these 13 states ...
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2016, 10:00:50 AM »
« Edited: July 17, 2016, 10:04:50 AM by Fusionmunster »

The Michigan poll is junk, Clinton has a wider lead there

Ohio finally looks a little encouraging

Iowa looks like a tough one for Team Blue because every poll is in the margin of error there so they all can't be wrong

If I'm remembering right, Iowa polling in 2012 was also quite close. Obama still won it by 6.

Iowa polling in 2014 was also quite close. Ernst still won it by 8.

Midterm vs Presidential.

Edit: Also, Yougov is terrible at polling Iowa. There last Iowa poll in 2014 had Braley up +1.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,238
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2016, 10:02:09 AM »

Ohio looks good. Iowa being to the right of OH, FL, and NC seems about right in this election. Michigan polls are notoriously junk. CBS/YouGov thinks Michigan got 3% whiter than 2012, which seems unlikely, and that 4% will vote for "Someone else" when they included Johnson and Stein. Sounds like disgruntled Sanders supporters.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2016, 10:08:00 AM »

There are 3 recent polls now for MI, all showing only Clinton+3.

She probably leads by a bigger margin than that, but it's a troubling trend for her.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,934
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2016, 10:10:12 AM »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 17, 2016, 10:12:00 AM »

There are 3 recent polls now for MI, all showing only Clinton+3.

She probably leads by a bigger margin than that, but it's a troubling trend for her.

One of which is Gravis, the other from I assume Morning Consult. Neither of which is reputable. Yougov really isn't either. I'm really not sure if your concern trolling at this point.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2016, 10:13:09 AM »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.

Yeah exactly ... Roll Eyes

Don't get delusional ... Hillary is not a saint with sky-high favourable ratings either (not even Obama won by those margins you are dreaming of and he was actually popular).
Logged
amdcpus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 307
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2016, 10:17:04 AM »

Ohio looks good. Iowa being to the right of OH, FL, and NC seems about right in this election. Michigan polls are notoriously junk. CBS/YouGov thinks Michigan got 3% whiter than 2012, which seems unlikely, and that 4% will vote for "Someone else" when they included Johnson and Stein. Sounds like disgruntled Sanders supporters.

They didn't include Johnson or Stein. They had to select someone else first before being offered Johnson or Stein.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,934
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2016, 10:17:44 AM »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.

Yeah exactly ... Roll Eyes

Don't get delusional ... Hillary is not a saint with sky-high favourable ratings either (not even Obama won by those margins you are dreaming of and he was actually popular).

After your "blaxicans" silliness, you should not be calling any names. Stop yourself, right now. If Trump can barely crack 40%, then there is every indication that he's headed for huge double digit losses based on college educated whites swinging heavily to Clinton. Unlike your country, we aren't all that keen on white supremacists and don't vote for them. Thank you.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2016, 10:18:57 AM »

New Poll: Iowa President by YouGov on 2016-07-15

Summary: D: 39%, R: 40%, U: 8%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2016, 10:20:24 AM »

New Poll: Ohio President by YouGov on 2016-07-15

Summary: D: 44%, R: 40%, U: 5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 17, 2016, 10:20:28 AM »
« Edited: July 17, 2016, 10:22:22 AM by dspNY »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.

LOL, that would be a 450+ EV landslide for Hillary. Even I'm not that optimistic. Ohio will be close like Ohio always is. Too many rural Republicans for that kind of result. 90% of the Ohio electorate is inelastic and completely locked into their party preference

FYI, I think Hillary has at least an 80% chance to sweep all the Obama 2012 swing states
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 17, 2016, 10:21:02 AM »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.

I mean, she is outspending him 50-1 in swing states. She "should" be ahead by 20 points, lol.

She's ahead by decent margins when you look at reputable pollsters. If you wanna put your hope in Yougov though, feel free.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 17, 2016, 10:21:45 AM »

Odd poll. MI definitely won't be to the right of OH, and I'd be surprised if IA was as well (especially by five points.)
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 17, 2016, 10:21:47 AM »

New Poll: Michigan President by YouGov on 2016-07-15

Summary: D: 42%, R: 39%, U: 8%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 17, 2016, 10:23:14 AM »

Isn't YouGov a fully online, Internet panel poll?
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,934
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 17, 2016, 10:35:49 AM »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.

LOL, that would be a 450+ EV landslide for Hillary. Even I'm not that optimistic. Ohio will be close like Ohio always is. Too many rural Republicans for that kind of result. 90% of the Ohio electorate is inelastic and completely locked into their party preference

FYI, I think Hillary has at least an 80% chance to sweep all the Obama 2012 swing states

At best for Trump, Ohio with be 54-43. That is assuming that he ties with college educated whites. He's simply not breaking out of the low 40s at this point, so I don't think Ohio will be that close.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 17, 2016, 10:37:52 AM »

Tump can only manage to get 38-42% of the vote in most polling. He's headed for double digit loses in all these states. Clinton probably gets 56-58% in Ohio if these trends keep up.

LOL, that would be a 450+ EV landslide for Hillary. Even I'm not that optimistic. Ohio will be close like Ohio always is. Too many rural Republicans for that kind of result. 90% of the Ohio electorate is inelastic and completely locked into their party preference

FYI, I think Hillary has at least an 80% chance to sweep all the Obama 2012 swing states

At best for Trump, Ohio with be 54-43. That is assuming that he ties with college educated whites. He's simply not breaking out of the low 40s at this point, so I don't think Ohio will be that close.

You think Hillary is getting 450 EVs? Because a double-digit Ohio win indicates a 12-14 point Hillaryslide (Ohio is around R+1, sometimes R+2)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 13 queries.