Was Reaganomics beneficial to the USA Econamy long term?

[OSR stands with Israel]

Yes

[OSR stands with Israel]

Yes because , up till Reagan was president , the people saw more regulation on business a good things, were willing to pay more in federal taxes so government had more money to spend. Then Reaganomics led to a 20 year boom

[OSR stands with Israel]

Yes because , up till Reagan was president , the people saw more regulation on business a good things, were willing to pay more in federal taxes so government had more money to spend. Then Reaganomics led to a 20 year boom

This is so inaccurate I don't even know where to begin.

Reaganomics was a net negative on America, not so much for its direct effects, but for encouraging all sorts of anti-intellectual, anti-government people to get into government for the sole purpose of destroying it. I believe that the Democrats had gone too far in the expansion of the state, but Reaganomics was not the required prescription.

if you believe Reagan was a bad president you shouldn't be a republican

[OSR stands with Israel]

Yes because , up till Reagan was president , the people saw more regulation on business a good things, were willing to pay more in federal taxes so government had more money to spend. Then Reaganomics led to a 20 year boom

This is so inaccurate I don't even know where to begin.

Reaganomics was a net negative on America, not so much for its direct effects, but for encouraging all sorts of anti-intellectual, anti-government people to get into government for the sole purpose of destroying it. I believe that the Democrats had gone too far in the expansion of the state, but Reaganomics was not the required prescription.

if you believe Reagan was a bad president you shouldn't be a republican

I worship God, not Ronald Reagan. The Republican Party should start doing the same.

no they should hold up Lincoln, McKinley, Teddy, IKE, Reagan, HW as its leaders. Republicans have the right to critize Reagan but to consider his economic policies  bad would be  to say dems have better economic polices then the gop

[OSR stands with Israel]

No, cutting things and dropping the top income tax rates do nothing for the economy. In fact cutting services that decrease the cost of living(public housing, publicly owned energy etc) or help the poor be able to purchase goods(food stamps, unemployment benefits) cause a large drop in consumer spending even if the tax cuts lead to bubbles and bull markets(which is itself a problem for obvious reasons.)

Consumer spending was clearly higher after Reagan then what was expected of the economy to be before Reagan