Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2019, 02:50:48 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
| | | | |-+  AZ-IWS: Trump +8
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: AZ-IWS: Trump +8  (Read 2247 times)
JRP1994
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,622


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 29, 2016, 10:31:16 pm »

http://data.workwithiws.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/IWS-Arizona-POTUS-General.pdf

Trump: 49% (48.8 )
Clinton: 41% (41.3 )
Johnson: 3%
Stein: 1%

« Last Edit: July 29, 2016, 10:55:24 pm by Likely Voter »Logged
Arch
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,975
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2016, 10:36:10 pm »

Let's wait for the Democratic bump to kick in to see how things level out.
Logged
Fusionmunster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,492


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2016, 10:38:32 pm »

How many times do I need to post this? Please just post the toplines of the poll in the thread subject and save any "analysis"  for the body.
Logged
NV less likely to flip than FL
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,590
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2016, 10:43:03 pm »

This would be consistent with a very close race. I wouldn't be surprised if Arizona ended up quite close if Clinton wins by a decent margin.
Logged
Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,723
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2016, 10:45:01 pm »

Who is this pollster?
Logged
psychprofessor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,078


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2016, 10:47:31 pm »

junk pollster, no cross tabs, all IVR...let's wait for something credible
« Last Edit: July 29, 2016, 10:49:47 pm by psychprofessor »Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,644
Dominica


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 29, 2016, 11:05:09 pm »

oh cool a one-night IVR poll! Roll Eyes
Logged
OwlRhetoric
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2016, 11:41:53 pm »

About what you'd expect to see, plus third parties at believable levels. I like this poll.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,365


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2016, 12:15:46 am »

I changed the headline. Again please keep headlines to just the facts with the actual numbers or the margin.
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2016, 12:43:37 am »

Interestingly, NBC is reporting that Pence will go to Arizona next week
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,785
Mexico


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2016, 12:55:00 am »

"Polling was conducted using a clustered IVR approach and results were
weighted to reflect the perceived electorate based on past presidential
election trends in Arizona. "

Why should we expect the electorate to mirror "past presidential election trends" in Arizona? I think polls that rely upon "voter files" are usually the most reliable but there are instances in which they have been miserable failures. In the event of a surge in voter registration and concomitantly high voter turnout, a reliance upon a voter file to create a universe of "likely voters" will almost certainly fail because irregular/new voters will compose a large share of the electorate.

How I know this poll is garbage: Donald Trump's favorables are far too high.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,785
Mexico


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2016, 02:04:37 am »

"Polling was conducted using a clustered IVR approach and results were
weighted to reflect the perceived electorate based on past presidential
election trends in Arizona. "

Why should we expect the electorate to mirror "past presidential election trends" in Arizona? I think polls that rely upon "voter files" are usually the most reliable but there are instances in which they have been miserable failures. In the event of a surge in voter registration and concomitantly high voter turnout, a reliance upon a voter file to create a universe of "likely voters" will almost certainly fail because irregular/new voters will compose a large share of the electorate.

How I know this poll is garbage: Donald Trump's favorables are far too high.

I don't know.  Hope you're right, but that's precisely the scenario that should keep us up at night.

As it turns out, I was wrong. I forgot to check the national polling aggregators; Trump's favorables have surged over the past weak from -25 to -15. Therefore, the poll probably makes a degree of sense.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28,712
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2016, 04:00:08 am »

lol

less than McCain's margin

less than Romney's margin
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,933
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2016, 06:32:52 am »

lol

less than McCain's margin

less than Romney's margin

But close.

Such is consistent with the results of the  Presidential races of 2008 and 2012, at least in Arizona. If one wants to see Donald Trump win, then such is bad news at this stage.  Trump must win Arizona; Hillary Clinton, like all Democrats since Harry Truman, can get away with losing Arizona.

But let's remember: Hillary Clinton has the Obama machine, the slickest Presidential campaign machine since that of at least Ronald Reagan, behind her. She trusts that campaign apparatus, one that Barack Obama gave the prerogative to say no to some quixotic attempt to win a State that he had little chance to win and that would put other states at risk of loss. 

2008 and 2012 races just after the latter Party convention looked close. They did not look like the end result.  Obama gained. He turned the race into one best described as a long-shot for a Republican victory and practically compelled McCain and Romney to make high-cost gambles to improve their chances.
Logged
IA more R than GA/TX/OH/FL
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2016, 06:35:29 am »

Trump +8 in a battleground state after the DNC? Cool.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
evergreen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,810
Antarctica


View Profile WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 30, 2016, 06:37:18 am »

Trump +8 in a battleground state after the DNC? Cool.
Trump +8 in a battleground state after the DNC? Cool.
arizona be´ng a battleground state? cool.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,933
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 30, 2016, 07:45:03 am »

Trump +8 in a battleground state after the DNC? Cool.

Arizona was on the fringe of contention in 2008 and 2012.
Logged
IA more R than GA/TX/OH/FL
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 30, 2016, 07:58:57 am »

If a Trump candidacy can't make AZ competitive, I don't know what will. Georgia is a much better bet for Democrats if they want to expand the map - especially in the long term.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,486
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 30, 2016, 08:06:09 am »

A 9 point win in 2012, so some crude extrapolation would suggest that the race is Clinton +5 right now.  If true (and there are a lot of assumptions here, so its very likely not) this would mean a 6 point convention bounce.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2016, 08:22:09 am by Mehmentum »Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,673
Sweden


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2016, 08:24:59 am »

A 9 point win in 2012, so some crude extrapolation would suggest that the race is Clinton +5 right now.
But, since we know, that Trump is a horrible mismatch for Arizona, some crude extrapolation would suggest that the race is Trump +5 right now Squinting
If it is true (it's a really big IF), this would mean a negative bounce Angry
« Last Edit: July 30, 2016, 08:27:08 am by LittleBigPlanet »Logged
#WalkAwayFromDesantis
Zyzz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,235


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 30, 2016, 03:05:13 pm »

Trump below 50 in solid red Arizona, BAD NEWS!
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 30, 2016, 03:12:02 pm »

Trump below 50 in solid red Arizona, BAD NEWS!

It's closer than that. Upthread I posted that Pence was making two campaign stops in Arizona. He wouldn't have to be there if it was R+8
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28,585
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 30, 2016, 06:58:10 pm »

     I'm wary of state-level polling around convention time. It seems like these would be even more vulnerable to bounce weirdness.
Logged
Human
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 466
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 30, 2016, 07:48:16 pm »

Don't be surprised at all if Donald Trump ends up winning Arizona by a decent margin on Election Day. Sure, Hispanics will turnout at record levels (thus hurting Trump's chances of victory), but this will easily be made up by anti-immigrant types turning out at record levels.
Logged
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,131
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -1.24

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 30, 2016, 10:16:18 pm »

Don't be surprised at all if Donald Trump ends up winning Arizona by a decent margin on Election Day. Sure, Hispanics will turnout at record levels (thus hurting Trump's chances of victory), but this will easily be made up by anti-immigrant types turning out at record levels.

The case could be made these people have already been voting Republican for years.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout


Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies
 

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines