MO- Remington Research: Trump +2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 05:26:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MO- Remington Research: Trump +2
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO- Remington Research: Trump +2  (Read 2889 times)
Fargobison
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,692


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 08, 2016, 06:52:29 PM »

Trump 44
Clinton 42
Johnson 5
Stein 2

https://www.stlmag.com/news/in-missouri-voter-polls-president-governor/
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2016, 06:53:39 PM »

Must resist the urge to call junk...
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2016, 06:53:57 PM »

I trust these guys.  They make good razors.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2016, 06:55:10 PM »

I don't know who these people are, but the numbers look about where I'd imagine they are.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2016, 06:58:11 PM »

Correlates well with the 538 Nowcast (Trump narrowly leads in MO)
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2016, 07:01:39 PM »

If Trump does lose as badly as the polls are suggesting, MO could be quite close.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2016, 07:01:49 PM »

Remington is Jeff Roe (Cruz's scummy campaign manager)'s firm. I don't know if their polls are biased against Democrats or not, but they have not reason to be boosting Hillary's numbers.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2016, 07:02:28 PM »

New Poll: Missouri President by Other Source on 2016-08-06

Summary: D: 42%, R: 44%, U: 7%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2016, 07:04:33 PM »

he really is down double digits if his lead in MO is only 2 and only 13 in Kentucky. I want a SC poll real bad now.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 08, 2016, 07:04:52 PM »

Remington is Jeff Roe (Cruz's scummy campaign manager)'s firm. I don't know if their polls are biased against Democrats or not, but they have not reason to be boosting Hillary's numbers.

Since he probably detests them both, he most likely told the firm to take an honest poll. I think these numbers right now are correct or very close to correct
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,069
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 08, 2016, 07:08:30 PM »

This looks right, though I wish Clinton were higher.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 08, 2016, 07:12:26 PM »

Yeah, I've never bought this idea of MO being out of reach of Clinton. Yes, it's shifted to the right, but you do have suburban whites who voted Obama/Romney and aren't exactly thrilled by Trump.

Gut call is that Trump would win it by 3-4 right now, but really in this case, calling any state that was close in 2008 to be out of reach for Clinton, all things being equal, is pretty silly.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 08, 2016, 07:28:32 PM »

wow i really didn't think Clinton had any shot at missouri, but this is a right-wing pollster.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 08, 2016, 07:34:55 PM »

Clinton could have a chance in Missouri. However, if she campaigns and spends money in Missouri, she could alienate voters who plan on voting for Jason Kander-Senate and Chris Koster-Governor. Roy Blunt already put out ads months ago tying Kander to Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iGlJF_KGF4
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 08, 2016, 07:58:23 PM »

Their last poll was Trump +6 iirc.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 08, 2016, 08:16:11 PM »

Clinton could have a chance in Missouri. However, if she campaigns and spends money in Missouri, she could alienate voters who plan on voting for Jason Kander-Senate and Chris Koster-Governor. Roy Blunt already put out ads months ago tying Kander to Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iGlJF_KGF4

Yes... but if Clinton is on the climb, how is that bad?
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 08, 2016, 08:28:26 PM »

Clinton could have a chance in Missouri. However, if she campaigns and spends money in Missouri, she could alienate voters who plan on voting for Jason Kander-Senate and Chris Koster-Governor. Roy Blunt already put out ads months ago tying Kander to Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iGlJF_KGF4

Yes... but if Clinton is on the climb, how is that bad?

Clearly it will encourage ticket splitting for the Clinton/Anti-Clinton voters.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,258
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 08, 2016, 08:42:31 PM »

I realize the demographics have shifted there since then, and McCain didn't invest much in MO either, but I've always had trouble calling a state Obama came within a fraction of a point from winning just 8 years ago to be truly out of reach for Hillary.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,090
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 08, 2016, 08:46:59 PM »

This firm has released several polls in recent times, yet 538 doesn't have a rating for it. Hmm.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 08, 2016, 09:00:18 PM »

Clinton could have a chance in Missouri. However, if she campaigns and spends money in Missouri, she could alienate voters who plan on voting for Jason Kander-Senate and Chris Koster-Governor. Roy Blunt already put out ads months ago tying Kander to Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iGlJF_KGF4

Yes... but if Clinton is on the climb, how is that bad?

True. McCaskill didn't tie herself to Obama in 2012..she didn't need to. She faced the ultraconservative Todd Akin. Robin Carnahan was probably damaged from Obama's visit in 2010 against Roy Blunt. Kander could campaign with Clinton to mobilize black voters.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2016, 11:12:28 PM »


Not fool's gold for the Senate race.

Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 08, 2016, 11:13:27 PM »


The dem is a good candidate, but I expect Blunt to run a few points ahead of Trump.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2016, 01:00:27 AM »

Clinton could have a chance in Missouri. However, if she campaigns and spends money in Missouri, she could alienate voters who plan on voting for Jason Kander-Senate and Chris Koster-Governor. Roy Blunt already put out ads months ago tying Kander to Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iGlJF_KGF4

Yes... but if Clinton is on the climb, how is that bad?

True. McCaskill didn't tie herself to Obama in 2012..she didn't need to. She faced the ultraconservative Todd Akin. Robin Carnahan was probably damaged from Obama's visit in 2010 against Roy Blunt. Kander could campaign with Clinton to mobilize black voters.

Ultraconservative Todd Akin ? !
That's putting it mildly, don't you think ?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2016, 02:10:16 AM »

This may be a very partisan pollster who gets results usually more favorable to Republicans than is justified -- but for a state that went by nearly 10% against Barack Obama, this is awful.   
Logged
crazy jimmie
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,513


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2016, 10:40:31 AM »

This firm has released several polls in recent times, yet 538 doesn't have a rating for it. Hmm.

This company has generally been a bit GOP biased in Missouri. Given Clinton's national margin, I am not surprised to see the two essentially tied in Missouri.

Of course, at the end, Trump will win the state and Democrats will hold the governorship. Both both could be close finishes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 14 queries.