NC-PPP: Clinton +2/+1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 08:58:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NC-PPP: Clinton +2/+1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-PPP: Clinton +2/+1  (Read 3866 times)
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,452
Puerto Rico


« on: August 09, 2016, 09:54:31 AM »


Not necessarily.  The recent GA polls with Clinton leads were from other pollsters.  PPP seems to have a slight R lean this cycle.  It would be nice to see them poll GA for comparison.

How does GA compare with NC in terms of educated voters?
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,452
Puerto Rico


« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2016, 10:06:45 AM »


Not necessarily.  The recent GA polls with Clinton leads were from other pollsters.  PPP seems to have a slight R lean this cycle.  It would be nice to see them poll GA for comparison.

How does GA compare with NC in terms of educated voters?

Pretty close; GA has a very slight advantage.

GA: 29.1% of the voting age population have a bachelor's degree or higher (30.1% for age 25+)

NC: 28.7% and 30.1%

Source: Census Bureau state electorate profiles at http://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2016/comm/electorate-profiles.html



Not large enough to account for the difference then... hmm.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,452
Puerto Rico


« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2016, 10:17:04 AM »

Larger AA population in GA + an already maxed out GOP rural white population + new arrivals in GA who are moderate = more serious swing potential in GA

That makes sense.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.