WI-Marquette: Clinton +10/+9 among RV, +15/+13 among LV

[MT Treasurer]

Among registered voters:

46% Clinton (D)
36% Trump (R)

42% Clinton (D)
33% Trump (R)
10% Johnson (L)
4% Stein (G)

Among likely voters:

52% Clinton (D)
37% Trump (R)

47% Clinton (D)
34% Trump (R)
9% Johnson (L)
3% Stein (G)

Done Aug. 4-7

[Wiz in Wis]

Among registered voters:

46% Clinton (D)
36% Trump (R)

LVs

52% Clinton (D)
37% Trump (R)

[dspNY]

Among registered voters:

46% Clinton (D)
36% Trump (R)

LVs

52% Clinton (D)
37% Trump (R)

Wisconsin is almost Safe D

[Yank2133]

Ouch.

[Fargobison]

Like I expected, just more evidence that he is toast.

[dspNY]

Minnesota and Michigan look pretty safe with numbers like this out of WI

[john cage bubblegum]

Even in a close election I think Trump would lose Wisconsin by a few.  But in this environment, he's gonna get massacred.

[dspNY]

4 way (LV): Clinton 47, Trump 34, Johnson 9, Stein 3

If Stein is getting 3% in Wisconsin she's doing worse in almost every other swing state.

Plus Trump at 34 in Wisconsin in a 4-way heat and 37 in a head-to-head is LOL hilarious

[Tender Branson]

Looks about right in a 2008-like race, like we have it now.

[Dr. Arch]

Yet TNVolunteer insists WI is even possible for Trump. It's not; it's long long gone.

[Gass3268]

Democrats are now more likely to vote than Republicans:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Tender Branson]

Democrats are now more likely to vote than Republicans:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Strange that a difference of just 3% among "likelihood to vote" yields a 5% worse result for Trump among LV ...

But I guess it adds up somehow if you do the math.

[dspNY]

Clinton favorables: 43/53
Trump favorables: 27/65!!!

[Fargobison]

Clinton favorables: 43/53
Trump favorables: 27/65!!!

This was all very predictable...From before the WI primary...

[Dr. Arch]

I think Sanders would have been up 60-30 here, lol.

Something like 58-35 I'd say.

[psychprofessor]

Not enough Reagan Democrats in Wisconsin.

[Maxwell]

lol Trump doesn't have a chance in Wisconsin. Yet some put this on their map.

[Fargobison]

I think Sanders would have been up 60-30 here, lol.

And Rubio would probably be beating Clinton.

[Dr. Arch]

I think Sanders would have been up 60-30 here, lol.

And Rubio would probably be beating Clinton.

Kasich would I think. I'm not sure about Rubio.

[MasterJedi]

Clinton favorables: 43/53
Trump favorables: 27/65!!!

This was all very predictable...From before the WI primary...

And right there you can see the HUGE educational divide. Farming/blue collar/poor outstate is for Trump but has a lot less population.

[Xing]

My condolences, TNMTVolunteer. Trump can't win Wisconsin. It's really interesting that Democrats are doing better among likely voters this time around.

[RINO Tom]

Republicans get most of their CONGRESSIONAL power from rural areas, but Republicans count on most of their winning MARGINS coming from highly populated suburban counties in most states.  For example, it's kind of irrelevant that rural KS is ultra-Republican, because if the KC suburbs weren't highly Republican, it wouldn't matter.  This is especially true in states like WI, MN and NH where the main suburban areas usually vote to the right of the rural areas.  If you're unappealing to those voters - the most likely to vote for a generic R AND in populous areas - kiss those states goodbye.

[Sir Mohamed]

The fake billionaire never had a chance in WI.

[MasterJedi]

As expected on local news social media websites this poll is fake, the election is rigged, people only see Trump signs and he has WI in the bag. Some guy thought they only polled Milwaukee, someone else thought they just polled Marquette students. The hurt is going to be immense!

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Wisconsin is almost Safe D