I think Sanders would have been up 60-30 here, lol.
And Rubio would probably be beating Clinton.
Kasich would I think. I'm not sure about Rubio.
Kasich is the only one who would've given Clinton a real run for the money in WI, and he also would've been more competitive than a typical republican in PA. Jeb/Rubio are too socially con for PA, and WI leans socially lib (although it's very polarized, like in 2000/2004). Hillary should've won it v. Jeb/Rubio in normal circumstances, WI dems would've been able to tie jeb/rubio to scott walker, and the angry berniebros would've voted for hillary 'as a vote against walker'. Kasich was the only danger to this thread, because his governing track record is a bit different from typical snyder/brownback/walker type governorships. This is also why even though the PV might've been a tossup in a bush/rubio race, Hillary would've had the EV advantage.
