WI-Marquette: Feingold +6/+9 (RV), +11/+10 (LV)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 09:29:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  WI-Marquette: Feingold +6/+9 (RV), +11/+10 (LV)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI-Marquette: Feingold +6/+9 (RV), +11/+10 (LV)  (Read 2053 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 10, 2016, 12:31:25 PM »
« edited: August 10, 2016, 12:34:21 PM by TN volunteer »

Among registered voters:

49% Russ Feingold (D)
43% Ron Johnson (R, inc.)

47% Russ Feingold (D)
38% Ron Johnson (R, inc.)
7% Phil Anderson (L)

Among likely voters:

53% Russ Feingold (D)
42% Ron Johnson (R, inc.)

50% Russ Feingold (D)
40% Ron Johnson (R, inc.)
7% Phil Anderson (L)
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2016, 12:33:57 PM »

The good people of Wisconsin realized they made a mistake in 2010.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2016, 12:34:59 PM »

That would be cool if they could poll WI-08 and WI-07
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2016, 12:43:32 PM »

The good people of Wisconsin realized they made a mistake in 2010.

WI is a really bipolar state, isn't it? Johnson should run against Baldwin in 2018, he'd probably win then. lol
It is. But I'd rather see Duffy do it, he's a way better candidate.

This state, and New Hampshire are gone. Florida and Ohio look good for Republicans, but Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Illinois are very much in play. I'd like to see a real Indiana poll to see what the situation there really is.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2016, 12:45:03 PM »

The good people of Wisconsin realized they made a mistake in 2010.

WI is a really bipolar state, isn't it? Johnson should run against Baldwin in 2018, he'd probably win then. lol
It is. But I'd rather see Duffy do it, he's a way better candidate.

This state, and New Hampshire are gone. Florida and Ohio look good for Republicans, but Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Illinois are very much in play. I'd like to see a real Indiana poll to see what the situation there really is.

I think NH, WI and IN are all gone at this point. If Kirk loses as well, Republicans really, really, really need to win that Senate race in Nevada. Looking tough right now, but we still got three months left. Smiley
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2016, 12:49:03 PM »

Even if undecideds break for Johnson (not a given), Feingold's got this. Likely D.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2016, 01:01:06 PM »

The good people of Wisconsin realized they made a mistake in 2010.

WI is a really bipolar state, isn't it? Johnson should run against Baldwin in 2018, he'd probably win then. lol
It is. But I'd rather see Duffy do it, he's a way better candidate.

This state, and New Hampshire are gone. Florida and Ohio look good for Republicans, but Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Illinois are very much in play. I'd like to see a real Indiana poll to see what the situation there really is.

I think NH, WI and IN are all gone at this point. If Kirk loses as well, Republicans really, really, really need to win that Senate race in Nevada. Looking tough right now, but we still got three months left. Smiley
Given the presidential numbers, if Clinton wins WI by 3 or less, Johnson can pull this off. The problem is, she'll win by 5 or more, and Johnson is NOT overperforming Trump by as much as he needs to. PPP should poll Illinois soon, we really need a good poll there. Given how Kirk won his D+6 (or so) House seat in 2008 even as Obama did really well, and how Duckworth underperformed Obama in 2012 in a Democratic-leaning district against a Tea Partier, I am still holding off hope in Illinois. Nevada and Pennsylvania will also be close. I'm not worried about Missouri anymore, and North Carolina could fall, but Burr is still doing okay in the new PPP poll. Arizona is also a wildcard (Likely R with McCain, Likely D with Ward).
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,251
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2016, 01:34:35 PM »

One of few polls where the Democrat does better among likely voters?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2016, 01:44:53 PM »

Johnson has been a pretty bad senator, absent on a ton of votes, rambles about un-important things. He'll lose, hope Duffy can take out Baldwin in 2018 though.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2016, 01:45:48 PM »

One of few polls where the Democrat does better among likely voters?
I think it has been trending this way the past few weeks? Looks like the result of Trump relying on some less likely/common voters and the GOP losing some very reliable voters (educated whites, e.g.).
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2016, 02:10:54 PM »

Johnson has been a pretty bad senator, absent on a ton of votes, rambles about un-important things. He'll lose, hope Duffy can take out Baldwin in 2018 though.
I have no doubt it will be highly competitive but Baldwin strikes me as definitely much more clever than Feingold though
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,251
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2016, 02:17:16 PM »

Johnson has been a pretty bad senator, absent on a ton of votes, rambles about un-important things. He'll lose, hope Duffy can take out Baldwin in 2018 though.

Who are you voting for?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2016, 02:29:27 PM »

New Poll: Wisconsin Senator by Marquette Law School on 2016-08-07

Summary: D: 50%, R: 40%, I: 7%, U: 3%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2016, 02:31:03 PM »

The good people of Wisconsin realized they made a mistake in 2010.

WI is a really bipolar state, isn't it? Johnson should run against Baldwin in 2018, he'd probably win then. lol

I wouldn't really say bipolar. Much like the rest of the country, it just has two different electorates in midterms and presidential years. Thompson would've utterly destroyed Baldwin in 2010 and Feingold would've curbstomped Johnson in 2012.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2016, 06:20:01 AM »

A Feingold victory would be the highlight of the night for me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.