NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton leading in CO (+14/+12), FL (+5), NC (+9), VA (+13/+12)

[ProudModerate2]

By the way, it looks like the Clinton campaign's internal polling is pretty damn good. They pulled out of CO/VA long before any public polls were showing her up double digits there.

Rather good point, actually. Keeping an eye on Clinton's campaign moves may be the best barometer we have on the election's status.

Agreed

Yep.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

By the way, it looks like the Clinton campaign's internal polling is pretty damn good. They pulled out of CO/VA long before any public polls were showing her up double digits there.

Rather good point, actually. Keeping an eye on Clinton's campaign moves may be the best barometer we have on the election's status.

Agreed

Yep.

Lol

[Classic Conservative]

I'm still looking for cross tabs has anybody found any

[NOVA Green]

I'm still looking for cross tabs has anybody found any

Here's something...

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/four-takeaways-latest-battleground-polls-n629536

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/tag/election-2016/

[Virginiá]

I'm still looking for cross tabs has anybody found any

Here's something...

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/four-takeaways-latest-battleground-polls-n629536

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/tag/election-2016/

The crosstabs for the PA Senate race are somewhat interesting:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

These are the exit polls from 2012's Senate race (Casey):

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Obviously the PA 2016 poll is early and things will change, and +4 years means many of those people from 2012 have moved up in the age brackets, but there are some funny changes there. I'm tempted to believe that when all is said and done, McGinty's support will more closely mirror Clinton's, even if it doesn't right now.

Just a thought.

[Badger]

So yeah, Trump is toast. 2008 is probably the best comparison right now.

If this trajectory keeps up 1964 might be a better comparison

slow your role, people. Hillary is NOT getting an over 20 point 44 state victory. at best she might get something comparable to a 1988 sized landslide (and even then the EC margin will be smaller).

[The Dowager Mod]

So yeah, Trump is toast. 2008 is probably the best comparison right now.

If this trajectory keeps up 1964 might be a better comparison

slow your role, people. Hillary is NOT getting an over 20 point 44 state victory. at best she might get something comparable to a 1988 sized landslide (and even then the EC margin will be smaller).

Party Pooper

[pbrower2a]

So yeah, Trump is toast. 2008 is probably the best comparison right now.

If this trajectory keeps up 1964 might be a better comparison

slow your role, people. Hillary is NOT getting an over 20 point 44 state victory. at best she might get something comparable to a 1988 sized landslide (and even then the EC margin will be smaller).

Obama in 2008 got almost the same share of the Presidential vote as George HW Bush got in 1988.

Hillary Clinton will definitely not get:

Alabama
Arkansas
Idaho
Kentucky
Louisiana
Oklahoma
Tennessee
West Virginia
Wyoming

She will certainly not get Nebraska's 3rd Congressional District.

I promise some interesting maps after the election...

Count on this: the Presidential election this time will not be interesting except for statistical freaks.