Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 16, 2019, 04:18:15 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
| | | | |-+  MO-Monmouth: Blunt +5
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MO-Monmouth: Blunt +5  (Read 570 times)
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,135
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -1.24

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 23, 2016, 12:06:19 pm »

http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_MO_082316/

Blunt - 48%
Kander - 43%
Dine (L) - 3%

One of the few MO polls to show Blunt outperforming Trump.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 12:08:17 pm by heatcharger »Logged

King Francis I
windjammer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13,636
France


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2016, 12:08:53 pm »

Hmmmm,
I think this is probably correct. Blunt has an edge but it has the potential of being competitive.
Logged

Quote
Flo   it seems like everytime i talk to you i have some sort of illness
Windjammer Partisan Voting Index for US state senates
Windjammer Partisan Voting Index for US State Houses
Joni Ernst 20∞
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,359
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2016, 01:23:27 pm »

If Kander is underperforming Clinton in MO, he's toast. Still, lean R for now.
Logged

populist neoliberal elitist corporatist polarized record levels polarization elastic inelastic elasticity inelasticity college-educated fiscally conservative socially liberal moderate reasonable wwc



Countdown timer to Joni Ernst's victory speech
Xing
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,156
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2016, 03:03:59 pm »

Blunt's vulnerability was always overrated. It's still possible Kander could win, but IL, WI, IN, NH, PA, FL, and probably NC or AZ will flip first.
Logged

heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,135
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -1.24

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2016, 03:11:21 pm »

Blunt's vulnerability was always overrated. It's still possible Kander could win, but IL, WI, IN, NH, PA, FL, and probably NC or AZ will flip first.

Possibly, but he's still vulnerable. Kander has very low name ID, so he might have room to grow. The Clinton campaign has also not invested in the state at all. Koster is also very popular, so there are many elements that could work in Kander's favor in this race.
Logged

JMT
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 921



View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2016, 01:28:14 pm »

This race could end up being a nail-biter, but I think Blunt still wins in the end
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines