UT-PPP: Lee +30
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:59:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  UT-PPP: Lee +30
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UT-PPP: Lee +30  (Read 1635 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 23, 2016, 02:06:33 PM »

Mike Lee (R, inc.): 51%
Misty Snow (D): 21%
Others: 8%

He even leads Jim Matheson by 7 (44-37).

Lee approval: 42/34 (+8)

Link.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2016, 02:13:24 PM »

If only Matheson could be the nominee lol
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2016, 02:15:19 PM »

He'd still lose. Matheson would only have a chance if he was down 5 or less (or tied or leading).
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,359
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2016, 02:15:51 PM »

lol who care
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2016, 02:16:19 PM »

He'd still lose. Matheson would only have a chance if he was down 5 or less (or tied or leading).
Yes probably, but I want to expand the map Smiley
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2016, 02:26:52 PM »

Ugh, Lee is terrible, and it's a shame that his favorables have gone up so much. No Democrat is winning Utah, though.
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,629
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2016, 04:21:53 PM »

New Poll: Utah Senator by Public Policy Polling on 2016-08-21

Summary: D: 21%, R: 51%, I: 8%, U: 20%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
evergreenarbor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 864


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2016, 07:45:48 PM »

Does Snow have any future in SLC politics? It's a shame that the first Trans nominee for US Senate is a sacrificial land who likely has no political career ahead of her.

She could build up publicity during her Senate run and then run for mayor of SLC or a state House/Senate seat, I guess?
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2016, 09:57:45 PM »

Ugh, Lee is terrible, and it's a shame that his favorables have gone up so much. No Democrat is winning Utah, though.

I'm going to guess Trump being the nominee made Lee look respectable in contrast.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2016, 10:00:35 PM »

Ugh, Lee is terrible, and it's a shame that his favorables have gone up so much. No Democrat is winning Utah, though.

I'm going to guess Trump being the nominee made Lee look respectable in contrast.

There's also the fact that Lee wasn't seriously challenged for renomination.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2016, 01:19:50 AM »

Does Snow have any future in SLC politics? It's a shame that the first Trans nominee for US Senate is a sacrificial land who likely has no political career ahead of her.

Mayor of SLC, City Council in SLC, possibly even a state legislator in SLC (all of our LGBT legislators have come from extremely liberal SLC neighborhoods). No future outside of that tiny bubble.

As a side note, an openly gay state senator (Jim Dabakis) currently represents the area where the LDS Church has its headquarters. And of course SLC, with its openly gay mayor, is the city where the headquarters is located. I think the city councilor is even Derek Kitchen, the hero of the LGBT side in Utah's fight about same-sex marriage.

And no, no Democrat is beating Lee, not even Matheson. Lee's been able to crush any establishment Republican opposition, so there's no challenge from that quarter either. We'll probably just send up more sacrificial lambs against him, as usual.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,261
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2016, 01:59:59 AM »

Why did they bother polling Matheson after the primaries?
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,109


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2016, 01:26:57 PM »

Why did they bother polling Matheson after the primaries?

Maybe in hopes that Matheson could pull an Evan Bayh and enter the race late? Not sure what Utah's laws are regarding that, but perhaps Dems could convince Snow to drop the senate race and have Matheson as the replacement. Highly unlikely to happen though, and I still think Lee would beat Matheson.

That's the only reason I could think of as to why they are still polling Matheson even after the primaries. That, or maybe the pollsters were just simply curious as to what that potential matchup would look like in a time where Trump is very unpopular in Utah.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.