PPP (For National Employment Law Project) - MO blunt +4
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 09:08:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  PPP (For National Employment Law Project) - MO blunt +4
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP (For National Employment Law Project) - MO blunt +4  (Read 1768 times)
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 01, 2016, 09:32:23 AM »

Blunt 47
Kander 43

http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/morning-score/2016/09/primary-season-recap-216139
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,233
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2016, 09:50:45 AM »

Obviously this poll was conducted for an employment advocacy group, but the fact that Kander jumps into a 4 point lead after hearing about their minimum wage stances is quite encouraging. I'd say this race is more winnable than AZ and OH.
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2016, 09:59:36 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Romney won MO by 10.

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,233
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2016, 10:00:05 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Romney won MO by 10.

Irrelevant, and you know that. Weighting by previous vote has always been a dubious practice.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2016, 10:10:26 AM »

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate

Yeah, but still seems a bit off. I'd say Blunt is up 6 or 7 now.
Why?
He's not particularly well-liked, a 4 points lead seems reasonable for me.
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2016, 10:35:34 AM »

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate

Yeah, but still seems a bit off. I'd say Blunt is up 6 or 7 now.

3-5 range would seem to match this and other polling data,
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2016, 10:37:36 AM »

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate

Yeah, but still seems a bit off. I'd say Blunt is up 6 or 7 now.
Why?
He's not particularly well-liked, a 4 points lead seems reasonable for me.
Romney voters appear a bit undersampled.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,233
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2016, 10:41:19 AM »

Romney voters appear a bit undersampled.

Among people who said "someone else/don't remember":
Trump 54%, Clinton 13%

Hmm, I wonder why... oh that's right:

People hate admitting they voted for the losing candidate.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,536
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2016, 01:03:12 PM »

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate

Yeah, but still seems a bit off. I'd say Blunt is up 6 or 7 now.
Why?
He's not particularly well-liked, a 4 points lead seems reasonable for me.
Romney voters appear a bit undersampled.
Or th y are saying they either don't remember/Obama.  People always "forget" these things.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2016, 11:12:10 PM »

Romney voters appear a bit undersampled.

Among people who said "someone else/don't remember":
Trump 54%, Clinton 13%

Hmm, I wonder why... oh that's right:

People hate admitting they voted for the losing candidate.

Yeah, this is why polls that weight by the 2012 result (like LA Times) are pure garbage. Putting aside the fact that the electorate will definitely change in 4 years, a lot of "Obama voters" will actually be Romney voters.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2016, 05:07:39 AM »

Yea this is the race democrats should be spending their time and money on not Ohio, that race is pretty much hopeless.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2016, 04:04:12 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Romney won MO by 10.

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate

Not that many people.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,124
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2016, 04:11:18 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Romney won MO by 10.

People hate admitting they voted for the losing canidate

Not that many people.
Sometimes some people hate doing the opposite. See: Bush voters, post-2004.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.