MU Wisconsin Law Poll: Clinton +2 LV +5 RV 2 Way Clinton +3LV +4RV 4 Way
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:28:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MU Wisconsin Law Poll: Clinton +2 LV +5 RV 2 Way Clinton +3LV +4RV 4 Way
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: MU Wisconsin Law Poll: Clinton +2 LV +5 RV 2 Way Clinton +3LV +4RV 4 Way  (Read 4241 times)
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 21, 2016, 12:23:45 PM »
« edited: September 21, 2016, 12:29:10 PM by Classic Conservative »

Clinton:44
Trump:42
2 Way LV

Clinton: 43%
Trump: 38%
2 Way RV

Clinton: 41%
Trump: 38%
Johnson: 11%
Stein: 2%
4 Way LV

Clinton:39%
Trump:35
Johnson:12%
Stein:3%
4 Way RV

Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2016, 12:25:06 PM »

Wisconsin? Marquette?
Logged
NeverAgain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2016, 12:25:14 PM »

What state is this, and link?
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2016, 12:25:55 PM »

Wisconsin
https://mobile.twitter.com/MULawPoll/status/778645810653306880
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,835
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2016, 12:26:52 PM »

This is WI/Marquette poll

4 way LV: Clinton 41, Trump 38, Johnson 11, Stein 2
4 way RV: Clinton 39, Trump 35, Johnson 12, Stein 3
2 way RV: Clinton 43, Trump 38

So no change in the 4-way, Clinton loses 1 point in the 2-way. Wisconsin is Lean Dem
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2016, 12:27:04 PM »


It's currently being live tweeted.

Nice to see that the bleeding here essentially stopped. Interesting that neither campaign is reacting like the state is a 2 point margin.
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,700
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2016, 12:27:21 PM »

Could be worse.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2016, 12:28:27 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,512
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2016, 12:30:28 PM »

So basically almost basically no change since August?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2016, 12:30:33 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2016, 12:31:06 PM »

Could be worse, seems to be flat since August. It may have drifted to Trump slightly in Interim
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2016, 12:31:47 PM »

Pretty close to a tossup. Clinton should be performing better here.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2016, 12:33:22 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.

If Trump is this close in Wisconsin, he's probably doing about the same in PA and CO as well. I know the PA polling doesn't show that, but it just doesn't make sense for PA to be Clinton +8 and Wisconsin to be Clinton +2 given the 2012 results. One of these numbers is wrong and it's probably not Marquette as they're one of the top pollsters in the country. Trump is really on the verge of being the favorite.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2016, 12:34:46 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.

If Trump is this close in Wisconsin, he's probably doing about the same in PA and CO as well. I know the PA polling doesn't show that, but it just doesn't make sense for PA to be Clinton +8 and Wisconsin to be Clinton +2 given the 2012 results. One of these numbers is wrong and it's probably not Marquette as they're one of the top pollsters in the country. Trump is really on the verge of being the favorite.

So... PA cannot be Clinton +8, when Wisconsin is Clinton +2, but then, by the same token, Charles Franklin used the NYT data and found Clinton up 3 in Florida? Dude... the states are moving around this year... stop comparing to 2012.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2016, 12:34:57 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.

If Trump is this close in Wisconsin, he's probably doing about the same in PA and CO as well. I know the PA polling doesn't show that, but it just doesn't make sense for PA to be Clinton +8 and Wisconsin to be Clinton +2 given the 2012 results. One of these numbers is wrong and it's probably not Marquette as they're one of the top pollsters in the country. Trump is really on the verge of being the favorite.

lol

WI has a completely different make up from PA and CO.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,917


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2016, 12:36:12 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.

If Trump is this close in Wisconsin, he's probably doing about the same in PA and CO as well. I know the PA polling doesn't show that, but it just doesn't make sense for PA to be Clinton +8 and Wisconsin to be Clinton +2 given the 2012 results. One of these numbers is wrong and it's probably not Marquette as they're one of the top pollsters in the country. Trump is really on the verge of being the favorite.
lol, what a dumb post
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2016, 12:37:10 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.

If Trump is this close in Wisconsin, he's probably doing about the same in PA and CO as well. I know the PA polling doesn't show that, but it just doesn't make sense for PA to be Clinton +8 and Wisconsin to be Clinton +2 given the 2012 results. One of these numbers is wrong and it's probably not Marquette as they're one of the top pollsters in the country. Trump is really on the verge of being the favorite.

PA and CO have a much higher % of college educated whites. That makes a big difference.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2016, 12:38:03 PM »

Potentially concerning, but I'll get worried about Wisconsin when (if?) a poll shows Trump ahead.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,633
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2016, 12:38:23 PM »

1.Trump has never led in a WI poll. At this point in 2012 Romney had already led in WI, including in a poll by PPP.
2.Those undecideds will break heavily for Hillary, this is one of the few "swing" states where she has hit 50% on more than one occasion. MU had her at 52-37% among LV after the DNC. Trump will never win WI.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2016, 12:38:39 PM »

Clinton is really a poor candidate. If Trump can avoid a major blunder in the debates, he may just pull it off.

#ShouldhavegonewithBiden

These numbers are really no different that Obama-Romney. Everyone should have known if Trump could consolidate Republicans this would be a close state. The state is just too polarized in an even election. I just don't think there are enough folks to put him over the top.

If Trump is this close in Wisconsin, he's probably doing about the same in PA and CO as well. I know the PA polling doesn't show that, but it just doesn't make sense for PA to be Clinton +8 and Wisconsin to be Clinton +2 given the 2012 results. One of these numbers is wrong and it's probably not Marquette as they're one of the top pollsters in the country. Trump is really on the verge of being the favorite.

PA and CO have a much higher % of college educated whites. That makes a big difference.

Seriously, those two states are closer to VA then they are to WI.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2016, 12:39:34 PM »

Terrifying numbers - the only relief is she's doing better in the four way and Trump's number (42%) isn't really anything to brag about.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2016, 12:43:04 PM »

In other news, Russ up a bit to +6. So, undecideds must still lean Dem for him to be pulling away and her to be stuck. Amazing how a shift of 0 is being treated as the sky falling.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2016, 12:43:33 PM »

Potentially concerning, but I'll get worried about Wisconsin when (if?) a poll shows Trump ahead.

If Clinton is campaign there or both sides put adds up, then I'd get worried.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,943


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2016, 12:47:49 PM »

This shouldn't be unexpected given how far Iowa has swung. Still part of the freiwal.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2016, 12:49:17 PM »

1.Trump has never led in a WI poll. At this point in 2012 Romney had already led in WI, including in a poll by PPP.
2.Those undecideds will break heavily for Hillary, this is one of the few "swing" states where she has hit 50% on more than one occasion. MU had her at 52-37% among LV after the DNC. Trump will never win WI.

you mean august,2012 poll
PPP (D)   8/16 - 8/19   1308 LV   2.7   Obama 47 Romney 48   Romney +1

Romney did worse at mid-late september,2012
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/wi/wisconsin_romney_vs_obama-1871.html#polls

Marquette University   9/27 - 9/30   894 LV   Obama 53   Romney 42   Obama +11
WeAskAmerica                  9/20 - 9/23   1238LV     Obama 53   Romney 41   Obama +12
PPP (D)                           9/18 - 9/19   842 LV      Obama 52   Romney 45   Obama +7
NBC/WSJ/Marist              9/16 - 9/18   968 LV    Obama 50   Romney 45   Obama +5
 
Plus, Romney had turnouts problem.
Now Hillary has, less than 200 people in Philly rally.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/19/photo-donald-trump-draws-massive-crowd-far-more-than-hillary-clinton-in-florida/

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 13 queries.