WY: DFM Research: Trump leads by 35
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 08:38:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  WY: DFM Research: Trump leads by 35
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WY: DFM Research: Trump leads by 35  (Read 976 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 21, 2016, 02:25:21 PM »

New Poll: Wyoming President by DFM Research on 2016-09-11

Summary: D: 19%, R: 54%, I: 12%, U: 15%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2016, 02:28:13 PM »

Wow, Johnson might actually get 2nd here.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2016, 02:28:26 PM »

Wyoming will be Trump's best state.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2016, 02:30:29 PM »

Cowboys are among the most bigoted, unpleasant demographics.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2016, 02:48:49 PM »

So much for Battlegroune Wyoming!
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,436
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2016, 02:51:50 PM »

Those numbers for Clinton are absolutely abysmal.

Democrats in a state like Wyoming tend to be solidly Democrat since they are so outnumbered, so this tells me there is a significant number of Millennial/Bernie type holdouts to explain only 19% support for Clinton.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,436
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2016, 02:52:43 PM »



But....but...but Trump's only at 54% so Clinton has plenty of room to grow. Wink
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2016, 02:53:10 PM »
« Edited: September 21, 2016, 02:59:39 PM by RFayette »

Those numbers for Clinton are absolutely abysmal.

Democrats in a state like Wyoming tend to be solidly Democrat since they are so outnumbered, so this tells me there is a significant number of Millennial/Bernie type holdouts to explain only 19% support for Clinton.

Unless you actually like the party's nominee, I never understood the urgency of voting for that person if you don't live in a swing state.  If I were registered to vote in California instead of back home, I'd definitely vote Darryl Castle.

So it makes sense young Wyoming Dems aren't too interested in a meaningless vote for Hillary.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,436
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2016, 03:01:55 PM »
« Edited: September 21, 2016, 03:10:53 PM by NOVA Green »

Those numbers for Clinton are absolutely abysmal.

Democrats in a state like Wyoming tend to be solidly Democrat since they are so outnumbered, so this tells me there is a significant number of Millennial/Bernie type holdouts to explain only 19% support for Clinton.

Unless you actually like the party's nominee, I never understood the urgency of voting for that person if you don't live in a swing state.  If I were registered to vote in California instead of back home, I'd definitely vote Darryl Castle.

Absolutely agreed, and I have cast many 3rd party votes over the years for various elections.

It seems to be cutting both ways this election cycle looking at polling numbers from safely Republican plain states, solidly Dem states in the Pacific Northwest, Texas as well as many other states in the union.

In Wyoming, typically 28/29% is the absolute floor for Dem Pres candidates and 35% would be the high end.

Even Bill Clinton got 34% in a three person race back in '92.
Logged
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 368


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2016, 03:04:33 PM »

Waiting for the "underperforming Romney by 6 points, so this means Clinton can start shopping for window drapes" posts.
Logged
Bakersfield Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,738
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2016, 03:06:52 PM »

Trump 54
Clinton 19
Johnson 10
Stein 2

With "independents" broken down.

402 Likely Voters; 4.9% margin of error.

Apologies for the Scribd link. I hate that site. Why can't they just post it as a PDF?!?!?

 https://www.scribd.com/document/324811878/WY-AL-DFM-Research-for-Ryan-Greene-Sept-2016
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,723


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2016, 03:12:19 PM »

ClintonUnder20
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2016, 10:11:34 PM »

That's pretty terrible for a poll that was commissioned by the Democrat candidate for Congress.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.