GQR: NH-Clinton +8 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:18:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  GQR: NH-Clinton +8 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: GQR: NH-Clinton +8  (Read 1158 times)
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« on: October 06, 2016, 08:16:59 PM »
« edited: October 06, 2016, 09:29:43 PM by Seriously? »

LMAO. From James Carville's hackish polling group for "Save the Children." Could it be anymore of an obvious D-plant poll to offset Suffolk today?
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2016, 10:55:08 PM »

LMAO. From James Carville's hackish polling group for "Save the Children." Could it be anymore of an obvious D-plant poll to offset Suffolk today?

So... you've gone from raising a legitimate issue of D-leaning polls maybe being too favorable to the laughable idea of a "plant" to "offset" a poll that was in the field at the same time and where they had no idea of the Suffolk outcome? Or was it never even in the field? A lot of people say that it might not have been?
I don't trust James Carville to do anything honestly. He was an original Clintonista. And if I gave my money to "Save the Children," I'd be looking for a refund.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.