CBS/YouGov: Clinton +4 (OH), Clinton +4 (WI), Clinton +8 (PA) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:58:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CBS/YouGov: Clinton +4 (OH), Clinton +4 (WI), Clinton +8 (PA) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CBS/YouGov: Clinton +4 (OH), Clinton +4 (WI), Clinton +8 (PA)  (Read 3420 times)
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,834
United States


« on: October 09, 2016, 08:45:42 AM »

I'm wary on WI, but I'll take it!
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,834
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2016, 09:47:18 AM »

the feingold numbers are creepy.

and makes me wonder the whole poll....hillary outrunning feingold in wi?

The Ohio and Pennsylvania numbers look plausible but the Wisconsin numbers are definitely GOP skewed

IMO, I think PA Senate numbers don't look plausible either. The other PA poll showed a race that seemed more consistent.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,834
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2016, 11:22:51 AM »

the feingold numbers are creepy.

and makes me wonder the whole poll....hillary outrunning feingold in wi?

The Ohio and Pennsylvania numbers look plausible but the Wisconsin numbers are definitely GOP skewed


IMO, I think PA Senate numbers don't look plausible either. The other PA poll showed a race that seemed more consistent.

Quinnipiac showed Toomey up 8 and Monmouth had McGinty and Toomey tied as well, so no.

Toomey up by 8 is an outlier. Why did you mention that result?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.