Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 25, 2019, 02:29:06 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
| | | | |-+  MT-Mason Dixon: Trump+10
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: MT-Mason Dixon: Trump+10  (Read 2398 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 48,179
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 15, 2016, 08:32:33 am »

Img


Quote
About the poll

The Mason-Dixon statewide poll included calls to landlines and cellphones Oct. 10 through 12 in the days after the first reports of Trumpís comments about kissing women without consent, news that speeches Clinton gave to banks did not always line up with her campaign platform, and the second televised debate. The results included 1,003 Montanans who reported they were both registered and likely to vote. The number of people polled in each county is proportionate to the historical voter turnout. The margin of error for statewide figures is 3.2 percent but higher for numbers broken down by gender, region or party.

http://billingsgazette.com/news/government-and-politics/trump-leads-in-montana-but-voters-aren-t-that-fond/article_1160276a-1827-51f5-890f-76fa6f4566f4.html
Logged
IA more R than GA/TX/OH/FL
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,605
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2016, 08:34:07 am »

B-b-but muh sleeper state MT! Sad Texas, Mississippi and Alaska would flip before Montana, although this state would have been competitive with Sanders as the Democratic nominee.
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2016, 08:34:53 am »

Romney won Montana by almost 14 points in 2012, by comparison
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 48,179
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2016, 08:37:33 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.
Logged
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,930
United States



View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2016, 08:41:15 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

I'm always uncomfortable extrapolating a single state poll to a national poll, especially since we have plenty of national polls, but...I'm curious on how you landed at Clinton +5.  That's not a hard swing versus 2012, unless you allocated undecideds/third parties and then applied a national swing.  I think we should be very careful about applying hard swings vs. 2012, even in states that are demographically representative of the U.S., and Montana is not demographically representative of the U.S. in any sense.

edit: and just to emphasize, I agree with Bundou.  Extrapolating a national lead from a state poll, especially a Montana poll, is a really, really bad idea
« Last Edit: October 15, 2016, 08:46:26 am by Alcon »Logged
BundouYMB
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 832


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2016, 08:41:35 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Actually, no it doesn't. 1). Because trying to guess a national lead from a Montana poll is certifiably INSANE and 2). because even if you wanted to do that, Romney won Montana by 14 when Obama won by 4 nationally, so logic would dictate Clinton is up by 8 now.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 48,179
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2016, 08:47:35 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Actually, no it doesn't. 1). Because trying to guess a national lead from a Montana poll is certifiably INSANE and 2). because even if you wanted to do that, Romney won Montana by 14 when Obama won by 4 nationally, so logic would dictate Clinton is up by 8 now.

Go to math class again.

MT is a small state and McCain won it by 2, while Obama won by 7 nationally, a difference of 9.

Romney won by 14 while Obama won by 4, a difference of 18.

So, it's likely that MT will be anywhere between 9 and 18 points more Republican than the nation.

A 5% Hillary lead looks likely with a 10% lead for Trump there.
Logged
BundouYMB
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 832


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2016, 09:00:25 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Actually, no it doesn't. 1). Because trying to guess a national lead from a Montana poll is certifiably INSANE and 2). because even if you wanted to do that, Romney won Montana by 14 when Obama won by 4 nationally, so logic would dictate Clinton is up by 8 now.

Go to math class again.

MT is a small state and McCain won it by 2, while Obama won by 7 nationally, a difference of 9.

Romney won by 14 while Obama won by 4, a difference of 18.

So, it's likely that MT will be anywhere between 9 and 18 points more Republican than the nation.

A 5% Hillary lead looks likely with a 10% lead for Trump there.

Whatever bizarre logic you need to delude yourself. Clinton's double digit win is just three weeks away.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 48,179
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2016, 09:02:39 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Actually, no it doesn't. 1). Because trying to guess a national lead from a Montana poll is certifiably INSANE and 2). because even if you wanted to do that, Romney won Montana by 14 when Obama won by 4 nationally, so logic would dictate Clinton is up by 8 now.

Go to math class again.

MT is a small state and McCain won it by 2, while Obama won by 7 nationally, a difference of 9.

Romney won by 14 while Obama won by 4, a difference of 18.

So, it's likely that MT will be anywhere between 9 and 18 points more Republican than the nation.

A 5% Hillary lead looks likely with a 10% lead for Trump there.

Whatever bizarre logic you need to delude yourself. Clinton's double digit win is just three weeks away.

Mkay ... and you call me deluded.
Logged
Fusionmunster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,492


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2016, 09:05:26 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

No it doesn't. It suggests Hillary 2016 =/= Obama 2008.
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2016, 09:07:02 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Actually, no it doesn't. 1). Because trying to guess a national lead from a Montana poll is certifiably INSANE and 2). because even if you wanted to do that, Romney won Montana by 14 when Obama won by 4 nationally, so logic would dictate Clinton is up by 8 now.

Go to math class again.

MT is a small state and McCain won it by 2, while Obama won by 7 nationally, a difference of 9.

Romney won by 14 while Obama won by 4, a difference of 18.

So, it's likely that MT will be anywhere between 9 and 18 points more Republican than the nation.

A 5% Hillary lead looks likely with a 10% lead for Trump there.

Montana is a state with a high ratio of non-college educated whites to college-educated whites. If Trump is lagging Romney in MT he is trailing by high single digits, something like 8-9%
Logged
Panda Express
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,157


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2016, 09:08:48 am »

This is probably a good state for Trump, demographically speaking
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,365
Greece


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2016, 09:11:03 am »

Tender has become as bad a poll-truther as StatesPoll.
Sad.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,444


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2016, 09:18:28 am »

Montana has a residual Democratic base like you don't see in other states in the region, and it's the kind of base you'd expected to have eroded at the Presidential level since 2008.
Logged
Gass3268
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,762
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 15, 2016, 09:21:00 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Trump is only up by 4 in Texas, that suggests that Hillary's lead is around 17% nationally.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,644
Dominica


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 15, 2016, 09:34:14 am »

Tender stop. You're making this thread reek of dog sweat. Just accept that your Muslim-hating hero is going down in flames.

Also, wtf why didn't they poll the governor's race?!
Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,628


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 15, 2016, 09:38:48 am »

Tender stop. You're making this thread reek of dog sweat. Just accept that your Muslim-hating hero is going down in flames.

Also, wtf why didn't they poll the governor's race?!

It's a poll for a newspaper group.  Chances are, they're holding off the governor's numbers for another day to sell more newspapers.

As for Tender's national margin extrapolation, I have no issue with it as long as you keep in mind that swings aren't necessarily uniform.  But I like PVIs more than most here.
Logged
ProudModerate2
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,634
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2016, 09:39:02 am »

Tender has become as bad a poll-truther as StatesPoll.
Sad.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,971
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 15, 2016, 09:45:06 am »

We have seen little polling for Montana. It's hard to think of a valid analogy for this state. Neighbors Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming, are different enough in culture and economics to be poor predictors of how Montana would vote.  It did go to Bill Clinton in 1992 and was close to going for Barack Obama in 2008. But that is in Presidential politics. There have been times in which Montana had two Democratic senators.

The agricultural activity is largely ranching and not farming, which has typically explained the difference between such states as Iowa (generally D) and Kansas (generally R) even if the demographics are otherwise similar.

Montana gets little attention because its three electoral votes mean little; the state has no large concentrations of people for mass rallies (see Nevada as a contrast). Montana voters typically have concerns other than the Presidential election. The Senate? Of course. Congress has as much importance as the Presidency in determining what America is.  
Logged
psychprofessor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,080


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2016, 09:53:50 am »

This poll suggests Hillary's lead is around 5% nationally.

Actually, no it doesn't. 1). Because trying to guess a national lead from a Montana poll is certifiably INSANE and 2). because even if you wanted to do that, Romney won Montana by 14 when Obama won by 4 nationally, so logic would dictate Clinton is up by 8 now.

Go to math class again.

MT is a small state and McCain won it by 2, while Obama won by 7 nationally, a difference of 9.

Romney won by 14 while Obama won by 4, a difference of 18.

So, it's likely that MT will be anywhere between 9 and 18 points more Republican than the nation.

A 5% Hillary lead looks likely with a 10% lead for Trump there.

As Obama says, C'mon man....you've been following this all election. You know that swings are not going to happen uniformly....states with higher percentages of college educated whites, such as CO and VA are heavily breaking for Hillary. States with higher percentages of non college educated whites are close. According to 538, with Hillary's current 7 point lead, she should lose Montana by 10. And in this poll, she loses by 10.
Logged
NV less likely to flip than FL
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2016, 11:33:02 am »

Montana's a tough state to predict/pin down. It could be a state where Trump does relatively better. A lot of people tend to assume that Montana and Alaska are one and the same, but Alaska has a much higher percentage of Native Americans and Asian Americans than Montana, so it makes sense that Trump would do better in Montana.
Logged
darthpi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,678
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.91

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 15, 2016, 11:35:00 am »

That sounds about right. I've long been skeptical that she would have any greater appeal among rural white voters in the West than President Obama in 2012.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,644
Dominica


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 15, 2016, 12:24:33 pm »

This is a state that Bernie could have probably put in play if he were the nominee, but based on the state's demographics there's not really any reason to think it would swing towards Clinton.
Logged
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 42,290
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 15, 2016, 01:01:35 pm »

I'm glad we finally got a poll from here. Still safe R I guess.
Logged
Snek!
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20,925
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 15, 2016, 01:06:31 pm »

It could very well be that Montana doesn't trend this year. If Obama lost 41-54 and Clinton goes down 49-38...that could well show a game at 41 to 47.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines