Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2018, 05:31:07 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: New features added! Click here for more information. Click here to configure new features.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
| | | | |-+  Democracy Corps/GQR: Clinton +12
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Democracy Corps/GQR: Clinton +12  (Read 3245 times)
HillOfANight
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,474
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 25, 2016, 02:28:52 pm »

http://www.democracycorps.com/attachments/article/1051/Dcor_Oct%20National_EAlert_10.25.2016_for%20release.pdf
https://twitter.com/DemCorps/status/790998887095873536



Their final poll.

Clinton 50
Trump 38
Johnson 5
Stein 2

Clinton 53
Trump 41

Four-way Vote (Clinton Trump)
Independents 36 37
Seniors 46 48
Men 43 43
White College Men 41 42
White Non-College Men 31 57

Women 56 33
Unmarried Women 59 31
White College Women 56 30
Millennials 59 20
Suburban 54 36
« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 02:31:45 pm by HillOfANight »Logged
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,148
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -1.24

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2016, 02:31:19 pm »

This is basically an internal, but it's not too far off from reality.
Logged

IceSpear
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28,187
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -5.70

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2016, 02:33:05 pm »

Let me guess, RCP won't include this even after including like 10 Republican polls today.
Logged

Southern Delegate Dwarven Dragon
Wulfric
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,550
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2016, 02:34:08 pm »

This is basically an internal, but it's not too far off from reality.
Logged



----
#SherrodBrown2020
https://tengaged.com/user/JasonEldridge

'18 Gov. Ratings: https://tinyurl.com/h35xfkr (10/18: TN: Strong Lean R ---> Safe R; 10/20: AK: Strong Lean R ---> Lean R)
'18 Senate Ratings: http://tinyurl.com/yb7sxe9a (10/10: TN: Toss-Up ---> Strong Lean R)
'18 House Rating: Lean D (3/14: Toss-Up ---> Lean D)
Arch
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,377
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2016, 02:35:27 pm »

Of course, and people are still debating whether Trump has a chance less than 2 weeks away.
Logged

Sic semper tyrannis.

Formerly:


Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,483
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2016, 02:36:14 pm »

THANK YOU!
Logged
BoAtlantis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 791


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2016, 02:36:26 pm »

Blazing



If you cherry-pick and cut it down to last two elections only, they were dead on in 2008 and 2012.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 02:38:36 pm by BoAtlantis »Logged
Devout Centrist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,829
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.45, S: -10.00

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2016, 02:41:24 pm »

What was their final 2012 poll?
Logged
Ronnie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,759
United States
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2016, 02:46:22 pm »

I think it's time we stop brushing off the idea that Hillary might actually win nationwide by double digits.
Logged

Born, raised, and currently residing in Southern California
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,937
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.91

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2016, 02:47:48 pm »

I think it's time we stop brushing off the idea that Hillary might actually win nationwide by double digits.
Logged
BoAtlantis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 791


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2016, 02:48:01 pm »

What was their final 2012 poll?


Obama 49   
Romney 45

Nov 1 – Nov 4, 2012
Logged
Devout Centrist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,829
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.45, S: -10.00

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2016, 02:49:31 pm »

What was their final 2012 poll?


Obama 49   
Romney 45

Nov 1 – Nov 4, 2012
Wowee!
Logged
Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,775
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2016, 02:50:53 pm »

Matches the ABC/WashPost 2-way and 4-way numbers exactly.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,648
Dominica


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2016, 02:52:01 pm »

Great result from a good firm but I don't know why they wouldn't wait another week before doing their final poll.
Logged

fuck nazis
Stirring Wolf🥣🐺
Xiivi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,347
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2016, 02:53:37 pm »

What was their final 2012 poll?


Obama 49   
Romney 45

Nov 1 – Nov 4, 2012

Their final poll was just a few days before the election in 2012.  Why are they doing their final poll two weeks before the election?

Hoping this is the final result!  If they have faith that the race will remain unchanged, then I won't question them.
Logged

Ebsy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,483
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2016, 02:55:11 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Logged
BoAtlantis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 791


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2016, 02:55:14 pm »

Let me guess, RCP won't include this even after including like 10 Republican polls today.

Very possible.

RCP stopped including this pollster in September 2012 while HuffPo included the October and November one.

I usually give RCP a break but their subtle tactics like this is the reason why they started losing credibility.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 02:56:45 pm by BoAtlantis »Logged
Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,775
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2016, 02:57:44 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.
Logged
BundouYMB
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 757


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2016, 03:16:07 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.

Uh, Democrats would easily retake the House if they won the PV by 9 points (that remains quite unlikely though.) The House isn't THAT gerrymandered.
Logged
elcorazon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,140


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2016, 03:24:35 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.

Uh, Democrats would easily retake the House if they won the PV by 9 points (that remains quite unlikely though.) The House isn't THAT gerrymandered.
I'm not sure about that. Dems are so concentrated in cities that they win practically uncontested in a lot of areas and are losing in so many rural areas or exurbs that they have a hard time keeping even (plus there's gerrymandering)
Logged


"The most important thing to remember is, no matter what anybody tells you, it is never, ever unpatriotic or un-American to question anything in a democracy"
GeorgiaModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,646


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2016, 03:32:29 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.

Uh, Democrats would easily retake the House if they won the PV by 9 points (that remains quite unlikely though.) The House isn't THAT gerrymandered.
I'm not sure about that. Dems are so concentrated in cities that they win practically uncontested in a lot of areas and are losing in so many rural areas or exurbs that they have a hard time keeping even (plus there's gerrymandering)

Yes, but one consequence of gerrymandering is that in a number of states, it has concentrated Democrats in a few districts and spread the Republicans more evenly among a larger number of districts.  This has created more R-leaning districts; but the flip side is that they're not R by very much (R+2, R+3, R+4, etc.)  A large pro-D wave could exceed these levels and potentially flip quite a few of those seats.  But what may save the R majority is a D failure to recruit good candidates in some of these districts.
Logged

"Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you."  (Stealers Wheel, 1973)

You can read my 1968 election alternate history in this thread: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=296543.0
Mr. Morden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37,716
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2016, 03:37:03 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.

Uh, Democrats would easily retake the House if they won the PV by 9 points (that remains quite unlikely though.) The House isn't THAT gerrymandered.
I'm not sure about that. Dems are so concentrated in cities that they win practically uncontested in a lot of areas and are losing in so many rural areas or exurbs that they have a hard time keeping even (plus there's gerrymandering)

If you do a uniform swing from the 2014 House results, a 9% national margin of victory for the Dems is (barely) enough to flip control of the House.  Actually, 7% gets you 1 seat short, but then there's a big gap for the final seat needed to flip control.

Of course, the swing won't be uniform.  But I'd say that number offers a rough idea of what would be necessary.  Anything between ~7 and 10%, and control of the House could go either way.
Logged

My magnum opus is now complete.  Read the complete "The Adventures of Hobo Orgy Guy & Blondie" (now in paperback).

What is your opinion of this thread?

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38,057
Samoa


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 25, 2016, 03:40:09 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.

Uh, Democrats would easily retake the House if they won the PV by 9 points (that remains quite unlikely though.) The House isn't THAT gerrymandered.
I'm not sure about that. Dems are so concentrated in cities that they win practically uncontested in a lot of areas and are losing in so many rural areas or exurbs that they have a hard time keeping even (plus there's gerrymandering)

If you do a uniform swing from the 2014 House results, a 9% national margin of victory for the Dems is (barely) enough to flip control of the House.  Actually, 7% gets you 1 seat short, but then there's a big gap for the final seat needed to flip control.

Of course, the swing won't be uniform.  But I'd say that number offers a rough idea of what would be necessary.


On top of that, some of the more marginal Pub seats have talented Pub incumbents. That is worth a few points off the top. Absent such incumbents, most of those marginals would go to the Dems this time.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia C
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12,616
Ukraine


P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2016, 04:21:28 pm »

Also, buried in the polling report is a discussion about a "simulated" 9 point lead for Democrats in the congressional ballot. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

I'd be pretty cautious on that, though big if true and probably enough to make the House very very close.

Ironically the Generic Ballot question in this Democracy Corps poll is R+1. This '9 pt simulation' is misunderstood - it's not a lead.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/gqr-d-democracy-corps-26432

That kind of generic ballot number goes against basically every other poll by a good bit and with a +12pt win in an era of significantly polarized politics and virtually non-existent ticket splitting, I think that generic result is impossible in such a large WH PV win. Even if more people do split tickets, it wouldn't come close to that with such a large Clinton win.

http://www.democracycorps.com/attachments/article/1051/Dcor_Oct%20National_FQ_10.24.2016_ealert.pdf
Logged

Zyzz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,862


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2016, 04:55:14 pm »

Let me guess, RCP won't include this even after including like 10 Republican polls today.

It would be smart to stop going to and mentioning RCP, they are a disgusting partisan hack website. I have avoided them all of the 2016 election cycle, and have been going to HuffPost pollster.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines