NBC/WSJ/Marist: NH-Clinton +9 NV-Tied (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:11:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NBC/WSJ/Marist: NH-Clinton +9 NV-Tied (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NBC/WSJ/Marist: NH-Clinton +9 NV-Tied  (Read 2993 times)
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« on: October 26, 2016, 04:05:59 PM »

As we've learned Presidential cycle after cycle, it's just tough to poll Nevada, even for pretty good pollsters like Marist.  It's still basically safe for Clinton.  If you want to call it Likely, fine whatever.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2016, 04:40:25 PM »

As we've learned Presidential cycle after cycle, it's just tough to poll Nevada, even for pretty good pollsters like Marist.  It's still basically safe for Clinton.  If you want to call it Likely, fine whatever.

But is it true?
In 2008/12, it was true. But it might be Obama thing rather then D thing. In 2004 rcp average was pretty good.

Do you guys know what polls showed in Nevada, 2000? I googled, but not found only one poll from Sep 29 2000 Sad
http://www.surveyusa.com/ArchivedArticles/NevadaNews.htm

It showed Al Gore +5


The NV polling did well in '04, but the Nevada electorate has changed significantly in 12 years.  Huge population growth, particularly among Latinos.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.