Emerson: FL HRC+1, OH Tie, NV HRC +2, NC HRC +3, WI HRC +6 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:25:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Emerson: FL HRC+1, OH Tie, NV HRC +2, NC HRC +3, WI HRC +6 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Emerson: FL HRC+1, OH Tie, NV HRC +2, NC HRC +3, WI HRC +6  (Read 3802 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,677


« on: October 29, 2016, 03:15:20 PM »

And just checking, the link confirms that they're still using IVR to landlines only.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,677


« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2016, 04:55:43 PM »


or that a pollster with a historic right-lean and landline only polling shows Clinton ahead in many swing states.

you know, take your pick.

Yeah---- I'm curious about percentage of landline only versus cell phone only by state, demographics, and age, since I suspect certain states like OH might have a higher population of landline-only residents versus states with large numbers of Millennials and less frequent voters.

The CDC tracks this information.  There's a good demographic breakdown from 2015 at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201512.pdf.  The latest state-by-state data I can find is a bit dated (2011-2012) at http://www.cdc.gov/nchS/data/nhsr/nhsr070.pdf.  Enjoy. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.