Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 15, 2019, 02:05:47 am
News: 2020 Presidential Predictions (General) are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderator: AndrewTX)
  CBS/YouGov: Clinton leads in CO, PA, NC; Trump leads in AZ
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: CBS/YouGov: Clinton leads in CO, PA, NC; Trump leads in AZ  (Read 4030 times)
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,217
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 30, 2016, 08:42:23 am »
« edited: October 30, 2016, 08:44:15 am by heatcharger »

Link.

Image Link
Logged
Arch
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,619
United States


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2016, 08:43:49 am »

PA and NC look excellent. The CO numbers are a bit low.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,987


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2016, 08:43:57 am »

+8 in PA? That's good news.

Colorado still scares me, since I wonder if the potheads will forget to mail in their ballots...
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,940
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2016, 08:44:02 am »

Surprising as it sounds, this is actually a good result for Clinton in CO. YouGov's panel has had C +1 the past two polls.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2016, 08:44:34 am »

This is huge news if true:

Image Link
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,940
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2016, 08:45:45 am »

Lol so once again the media has hyped up a massive nothing story that nobody actually cares about.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2016, 08:46:50 am »

Bennett is only up 5 in Colorado in their Senate poll, so yeah
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29,553


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2016, 08:46:56 am »

Yeah, that looks like she'll be fine.
Logged
Arch
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,619
United States


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2016, 08:47:02 am »


The backfire!!
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2016, 08:47:36 am »


That's actually really good for Clinton. Not much of a dropoff in independents and 13% of Clinton's base more fired up
Logged
BoAtlantis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2016, 08:50:31 am »

Good results for her
Logged
Edgar Suit Larry
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2016, 08:51:30 am »

Surprising as it sounds, this is actually a good result for Clinton in CO. YouGov's panel has had C +1 the past two polls.
Isn't this HIGHEST a Democrat has been in a YouGuv poll in Colorado?
Logged
dspNY
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2016, 08:52:00 am »

Surprising as it sounds, this is actually a good result for Clinton in CO. YouGov's panel has had C +1 the past two polls.
Isn't this HIGHEST a Democrat has been in a YouGuv poll in Colorado?

Yes. YouGov had Colorado at Clinton +1 and +2 previously
Logged
Edgar Suit Larry
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2016, 08:53:36 am »

Surprising as it sounds, this is actually a good result for Clinton in CO. YouGov's panel has had C +1 the past two polls.
Isn't this HIGHEST a Democrat has been in a YouGuv poll in Colorado?

Yes. YouGov had Colorado at Clinton +1 and +2 previously
Oh. Sorry Obama was doing a point or two better in September.
Was doing worse now.
Logged
BoAtlantis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2016, 08:54:43 am »

+8 in PA? That's good news.

Colorado still scares me, since I wonder if the potheads will forget to mail in their ballots...

More of them tend to be young. They'll tell pollsters they'll go Johnson but in reality, they'll probably skew a bit more Hillary.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,378
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2016, 08:56:16 am »

That 21% isn't good.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2016, 08:56:31 am »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Does this mean I can confer that Clinton is still leading by at least 5ish points?


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Best number here.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,940
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2016, 08:59:10 am »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Does this mean I can confer that Clinton is still leading by at least 5ish points?


Probably. At this point, people are basing their opinions based off which side they've chosen.
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,868
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2016, 09:00:46 am »

At least they used the right pictures this time xD
Logged
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 42,851
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2016, 09:01:36 am »

That's a solid number in PA for Hillary.

The rest seem shakier but they're not nearly as important anyway.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,183
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2016, 09:02:57 am »

That's a solid number in PA for Hillary.

The rest seem shakier but they're not nearly as important anyway.

And, as has been noted, these numbers actually represent pretty high numbers for Clinton in Yougovs polling this year. These are........good numbers, you guys.
Logged
Edgar Suit Larry
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2016, 09:04:17 am »

That's a solid number in PA for Hillary.

The rest seem shakier but they're not nearly as important anyway.

And, as has been noted, these numbers actually represent pretty high numbers for Clinton in Yougovs polling this year. These are........good numbers, you guys.
The best numbers?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 50,654
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2016, 09:04:18 am »

PA will likely be narrower in the end.

CO is too low for Clinton (probably up 5-6).

AZ looks about right (Hillary won't win there, it's a dream).

NC should be quite close in the end, like I said in another thread.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,940
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2016, 09:08:52 am »

PA will likely be narrower in the end.

CO is too low for Clinton (probably up 5-6).

AZ looks about right (Hillary won't win there, it's a dream).

NC should be quite close in the end, like I said in another thread.

And are you basing that off of anything besides your gut? You can't just say something will be close by pointing to another post saying that your gut says so as evidence.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,237
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2016, 09:09:45 am »

PA will likely be narrower in the end.

CO is too low for Clinton (probably up 5-6).

AZ looks about right (Hillary won't win there, it's a dream).

NC should be quite close in the end, like I said in another thread.

And are you basing that off of anything besides your gut? You can't just say something will be close by pointing to another post saying that your gut says so as evidence.
Remember he doesn't like the w(b)itch. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC