Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2019, 03:20:59 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  Election Archive
| | |-+  All Archived Boards
| | | |-+  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
| | | | |-+  MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MO-Remington Research: Blunt +3  (Read 954 times)
IA more R than GA/TX/OH/FL
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 31, 2016, 11:19:51 am »

47% Roy Blunt (R, inc.)
44% Jason Kander (D)

The poll was taken Oct. 27 and 28. It tallied 1,698 surveys with a margin of error of +/- 2.38% percent.

http://themissouritimes.com/35134/blunt-opens-lead-kander-new-poll/
Logged
Southern Dep. Speaker Dwarven Dragon
Wulfric
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20,702
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2016, 11:21:04 am »

Finally they release their poll!

Still a Toss-Up race though.
Logged
Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,779
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2016, 11:28:18 am »

Not a good poll at all for Blunt considering the pollster.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,220
United States


View Profile WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2016, 11:32:43 am »

Not a good poll at all for Blunt considering the pollster.
When it's affiliated with the campaign, it really is bad.
Logged
NV less likely to flip than FL
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,590
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2016, 11:36:10 am »

Terrible poll for Blunt, since this is (R)emington. If he underperforms Trump by 11, he'll probably lose.
Logged
IA more R than GA/TX/OH/FL
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,593
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2016, 11:40:34 am »

This is a Tossup obviously, but do we need any more evidence that the coattail effect is exaggerated?
Logged
DavidB.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,306
Netherlands


Political Matrix
E: -1.74, S: 5.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2016, 12:01:31 pm »

Haha, all pollsters are pro-R in the world of many posters Roll Eyes Blunt +3 is a perfectly believable poll result. This race is a tossup. You're going to get results varying from Kander +3 to Blunt +3.
Logged
Jimmie
jamespol
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,331


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2016, 12:04:38 pm »

Haha, all pollsters are pro-R in the world of many posters Roll Eyes Blunt +3 is a perfectly believable poll result. This race is a tossup. You're going to get results varying from Kander +3 to Blunt +3.


This is actually a Republican poll. But I am still scared.. maybe the forum was right when a few months ago many said Greitens would landslide.
Logged
DavidB.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11,306
Netherlands


Political Matrix
E: -1.74, S: 5.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2016, 12:10:33 pm »

Yes Remington is Republican, just like PPP is Democratic, but that does not mean there are methodological problems with their research. If any of you can point out Remington did anything wrong in conducting this poll I'll be the first to say you're right, but this does not seem like a particularly strange result at all. If this was Blunt +6, that would be fishy, but Blunt +3 is perfectly believable.

Not sure what Greitens has to do with this.
Logged
NV less likely to flip than FL
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,590
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2016, 12:37:03 pm »

If you look at pretty much all of their other results, you'll find that this pollster has had a consistent Republican bias. PPP, while it is a Democratic pollster, has not had the same systemic bias, except in a few key races.

As for the coattail effect, well, if Heck, Toomey, and Ayotte all go down, that's some pretty solid evidence for coattails. One specific race with a strong Democratic challenger and a very generic incumbent doesn't exactly disprove what's been a very obvious trend over the past two decades.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout


Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies
 

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines