MO, Monmouth, Trump +14 (4-way)

[Erich Maria Remarque]

The Monmouth University Poll  was conducted by telephone from October 28 to 31, 2016 with 405 Missouri residents likely to vote in the November election.  This sample has a margin of error of ± 4.9 percent.

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_MO_110116/
https://www.monmouth.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=40802212044

Compared to    OCT. 9-11

Trump  52% (+6)
Clinton 38%  (-3)
Johnson  4%   (-1)  
Stein      2%    (-)
Other     1%     (-)
Undecided   4% (-1)

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Lol, only 4% changed their mind. O-N-L-Y, lol

[Erich Maria Remarque]

Blunt underperforming Trump by 13 points.

Beautiful!! What a movement we have! In spite of the GOP being such a horrible institution, voters see Trump is not part of it! Great!

[Erich Maria Remarque]

Gosh, Roy Blunt is such an idiot.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

Gosh, Roy Blunt is such an idiot.

Why would conservatives be happy that Blunt is underperforming by 13 and could risk the GOP the senate? Remember, there are still very many 'normal/traditional' Republicans and conservatives that aren't red-blooded Trumpists. Blunt's risking the GOP senate hold where it should have never been a problem.

OK. I thought they had something particular in mind that he had done (like endorse Trump?).

[Erich Maria Remarque]

So they are not polling swing states, because as he say "the state swing polling is looking the same, at least right now".

How does he know that, if they are not polling it? Eh?

And on October 28 (Comey's letter) he didn't sound that way

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So it is his opinion on swing-states that does not based on data.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

So they are not polling swing states, because as he say "the state swing polling is looking the same, at least right now".

How does he know that, if they are not polling it? Eh?

He is a known Clinton hack.

I know. I follow him on twitter. But this one was way off...

Right now, all the Dems are trying to say: It is OK. If it is, why bother?

So they are not polling swing states, because as he say "the state swing polling is looking the same, at least right now".

How does he know that, if they are not polling it? Eh?

one of the most ignorant responses. he haven't seen movement because there were not too many respected polls since then. it isn't surprising to see polling errors when these kind of polling geniuses are running the show

Nate-Silver-primary sindrom...