MO-Monmouth: Blunt +1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:43:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-Monmouth: Blunt +1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Monmouth: Blunt +1  (Read 3579 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: November 01, 2016, 12:14:08 PM »

I doubt Trump wins MO by 14, so another bad poll for Blunt.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2016, 12:31:06 PM »

If Trump does win by 14, I can't see how Blunt doesn't win.

Coattails aren't really a thing, though.

Repeating the same thing multiple times doesn't make it true. Blunt is just lucky that he's running in a n increasingly red state. If he were running in a swing state, he'd likely get Blanched.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2016, 12:41:04 PM »

If Trump does win by 14, I can't see how Blunt doesn't win.

Coattails aren't really a thing, though.

Repeating the same thing multiple times doesn't make it true. Blunt is just lucky that he's running in a n increasingly red state. If he were running in a swing state, he'd likely get Blanched.

If coattails were a thing, Heitkamp, Manchin, Donnelly, Collins, etc. wouldn't be Senators today and Blunt would be winning in a landslide. Granted, red states are more likely to split their tickets and vote for a Democrat for Senate or Governor than blue states, but still.

Coattails are stronger in some states than others, and don't make candidate quality completely irrelevant. However, if they weren't a thing at all, I doubt ND and IN would have been anywhere near as close. I also doubt that the Senate races in OH, PA, VA, and WI that year (among others) would have been so close to the presidential election. Would Bruce Poliquin have beaten Emily Cain in 2012? Would Rod Blum have won in 2012? Would he even have a chance of winning this year if Hillary was doing well in Iowa, and Grassley wasn't running for re-election?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.