RAND National: Clinton +9

[Ozymandias]

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1792.html

Clinton - 44
Trump - 35
Johnson - 8

10/20-11/1, 2269 respondents, 1.9% MOE

[Horus]

Way too many undecideds and I've never heard of them.

[Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.]

Buhhhhhh meh Trump and Comey surge!

[Mallow]

Way too many undecideds and I've never heard of them.

Really? I mean, 9 is obviously an outlier at this point, but even I've heard of RAND.

[Brittain33]

Not believing Johnson at 8% this late in the game.

[swf541]

Way too many undecideds and I've never heard of them.

How have you never heard of Rand?

[ApatheticAustrian]

aren't those the original tracker pollsters?

[rafta_rafta]

Didn't this pollster release some atrocious poll earlier

[GeorgiaModerate]

538 lists them as B- with a negligible bias, but that's based on only 3 polls.

[Ozymandias]

Way too many undecideds and I've never heard of them.

538 had RAND ranked as the fourth best pollster in 2012: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/

[Erich Maria Remarque]

Previous:

Clinton: 43
Trump: 33
Johnson: 10

Conducted September 12-25.

So the race is about as at Sep 12-25. Consistent.

[afleitch]

Yey, RAND is back! A wee bit old though, which is annoying.

[Obama-Biden Democrat]

Beautiful! Thank you America for seeing through Comey's BS!

[IceSpear]

Pre-Comey, too many undecideds, Johnson too high. Junk.

[Yank2133]

Rand was fairly accurate in 2012 if I remember correctly.

[Ozymandias]

Pre-Comey, too many undecideds, Johnson too high. Junk.

The poll includes 4-5 post-Comey days.

[Storebought]

The divergence between national polls and the state polls has grown ludicrous.

[swf541]

The divergence between national polls and the state polls has grown ludicrous.

The divergence between all polls has grown way to ludicrous

[IceSpear]

Pre-Comey, too many undecideds, Johnson too high. Junk.

The poll includes 4-5 post-Comey days.

Not nearly enough when it starts at 10/20. Having too long of a field period is always bad.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

[ProudModerate2]

It's on the high side (outlier).
But still good news, even if you bring down the number.

[Beefalow and the Consumer]

Not believing Johnson at 8% this late in the game.

[Wiz in Wis]

Can we at least say, once again, with vigor, that this dispels the notion that the LAT/Dornsife poll is "based on the RAND Panel" and is therefore good to go? Please?

[swf541]

Can we at least say, once again, with vigor, that this dispels the notion that the LAT/Dornsife poll is "based on the RAND Panel" and is therefore good to go? Please?

[Ebsy]

Can we at least say, once again, with vigor, that this dispels the notion that the LAT/Dornsife poll is "based on the RAND Panel" and is therefore good to go? Please?

This idiocy was advanced by The Vorlon.