SurveyMonkey Senate polls - Daily tracker!

[Joni Ernst 20∞]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxxpEMTW3kAraEFpRXdFc21TVG8/view

Indiana: 50% Young (R), 46% Bayh (D)
Florida: 49% Rubio (R), 47% Murphy (D)
Arizona: 49% McCain (R), 46% Kirkpatrick (D)
Ohio: 55% Portman (R), 40% Strickland (D)
Iowa: 56% Grassley (R), 41% Judge (D)

Missouri: 51% Kander (D), 45% Blunt (R)
Illinois: 57% Duckworth (D), 38% Kirk (R)
New Hampshire: 50% Hassan (D), 38% Ayotte (R)
North Carolina: 47% Ross (D), 43% Burr (R)
Pennsylvania: 49% McGinty (D), 46% Toomey (R)
Colorado: 48% Bennet (D), 46% Glenn (R)

Wisconsin: 49% Johnson (R), 49% Feingold (D)
Nevada: 47% Heck (R), 47% Masto (D)

[Jimmie]

Oh no! Kander is only 6 points ahead of blunt! Lets all freak out!

Oh No! Bayh is 4 points being Young in a mass poll! Let's panaic!

Yay! Murphy is only two points behind Rubio! We can win this seat.

lol joking a bit.

But seriously, these numbers do not look too far off.

[QE]

Colorado... Wat.

[morgieb]

Some of those numbers seem pretty whack. Colorado and Wisconsin mainly.

[Joni Ernst 20∞]

Some of those numbers seem pretty whack. Colorado and Wisconsin mainly.

NH is probably the junkiest one, though. NC is also not believable.

[Castro]

Some of those numbers seem pretty whack. Colorado and Wisconsin mainly.

NH is probably the junkiest one, though. NC is also not believable.

True, there's no way Hassan is only leading by just 12.

[yeah_93]

idontbelieveyou.gif

[Xing]

Okaaaaay.

Not sure why NC is the least believable one here. I'd say NH, MO, CO, IL, and WI are far less believable.

[Kevin]

Some of those numbers seem pretty whack. Colorado and Wisconsin mainly.

NH is probably the junkiest one, though. NC is also not believable.

I think New Hampshire is most certainly correct since's it's quickly becoming the next Vermont on all levels.

[Joni Ernst 20∞]

Some of those numbers seem pretty whack. Colorado and Wisconsin mainly.

NH is probably the junkiest one, though. NC is also not believable.

I think New Hampshire is most certainly correct since's it's quickly becoming the next Vermont on all levels.

I know that (and the race is certainly Safe D), but even Ayotte isn't going to lose by more than 6 points.

[DavidB.]

Junk poll!
- IN (Young could be up but not by that much), AZ (not so close), CO (not so close), NH (this race is almost tied, not +12 WTF) and WI (Feingold and Johnson are not tied) are definitely off.
- OH, IA, IL, PA and NV are about right.
- MO (Kander up by that much?), NC (Ross up by that much?) and FL (so close?)... could be true, but color me skeptical.

[DavidB.]

538 adjusted them all by R+1, which means Johnson actually leads in the WI poll. LMAO.

[Ebsy]

Good numbers for the Democrats on average.

[Green Line]

About half junk polls and half correct polls.

[Joni Ernst 20∞]

Today's numbers (Oct 26-Nov 1):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxxpEMTW3kArcTNEc0hBTzFlSVE/view

Indiana: 51% Young (R), 46% Bayh (D) (R+1)
Florida: 49% Rubio (R), 47% Murphy (D) (no change)
Arizona: 50% McCain (R), 44% Kirkpatrick (D) (R+3)
Ohio: 57% Portman (R), 39% Strickland (D) (R+3)
Iowa: 56% Grassley (R), 41% Judge (D) (no change)
Wisconsin: 50% Johnson (R), 48% Feingold (D) (R+2)

Missouri: 50% Kander (D), 46% Blunt (R) (R+2)
Illinois: 55% Duckworth (D), 39% Kirk (R) (R+3)
New Hampshire: 50% Hassan (D), 38% Ayotte (R) (no change)
North Carolina: 47% Ross (D), 43% Burr (R) (no change)
Pennsylvania: 50% McGinty (D), 46% Toomey (R) (D+1)
Colorado: 49% Bennet (D), 47% Glenn (R) (no change)

Nevada: 47% Heck (R), 47% Masto (D) (no change)

Also, their Louisiana numbers: 23% Kennedy (R), 21% Fayard (D), 13% Boustany (R), 13% Campbell (D), 12% Fleming (R), 4% Maness (R), 2% Duke (R)

[Shadows]

I hope a Feingold loss is not a deciding factor. He is a strong candidate & did well throughout the race. But looks like all those M of $ of Negative ads with little to no support from Dems narrowed this race.

Dems have themselves to blame for a Feingold loss!

[Heisenberg]

Louisiana looks junk. No way Fayard finishes ahead of Campbell.

[Southern Dep. Speaker Dwarven Dragon]

Louisiana looks junk. No way Fayard finishes ahead of Campbell.

Campbell is not a friend of the oil industry. That matters in LA.

[Secret Cavern Survivor]

A tracker for Senate races?

God help us all.

[Heisenberg]

Louisiana looks junk. No way Fayard finishes ahead of Campbell.

Campbell is not a friend of the oil industry. That matters in LA.

Just found this. Did not know that about Campbell. From what I know, and from what Miles tells me, I though Campbell would be the much stronger Democrat, as Fayard's base seems to be only White, New Orleans-area Democrats, whereas Campbell seems to have nearly all the Black vote locked down, plus many of the White Democrats. The results of next week's jungle primary will be very interesting, to say the least.

[Young Conservative]

Some of those numbers seem pretty whack. Colorado and Wisconsin mainly.

Based on the other polls that came out today, Wisconsin looks about right. Also, a CBS/Yougov found the same colorado result a few days ago. #TIGHTENING

[Joni Ernst 20∞]

Today's numbers (Oct 27-Nov 2):

Indiana: 51% Young (R), 44% Bayh (D) (R+2)
Florida: 49% Rubio (R), 48% Murphy (D) (D+1)
Arizona: 50% McCain (R), 44% Kirkpatrick (D) (no change)
Ohio: 57% Portman (R), 40% Strickland (D) (D+1)
Iowa: 57% Grassley (R), 40% Judge (D) (R+2)

Missouri: 51% Kander (D), 45% Blunt (R) (D+2)
Illinois: 55% Duckworth (D), 40% Kirk (R) (R+1)
New Hampshire: 50% Hassan (D), 37% Ayotte (R) (D+1)
North Carolina: 47% Ross (D), 44% Burr (R) (R+1)
Pennsylvania: 50% McGinty (D), 46% Toomey (R) (no change)
Colorado: 50% Bennet (D), 46% Glenn (R) (D+2)
Nevada: 48% Cortez-Masto (D), 47% Heck (R) (D+1)

Wisconsin: 48% Johnson (R), 48% Feingold (D) (D+2)

Louisiana numbers: 21% Kennedy (R), 21% Fayard (D), 13% Boustany (R), 13% Campbell (D), 12% Fleming (R), 5% Maness (R), 3% Duke (R)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxxpEMTW3kArd1o5cmhoTmVQbDg/view

[Lief 🐋]

Can't wait for Survey Monkey to become the new NH gold standard next Tuesday!

[Stranger in a strange land]

I know this is a junk poll, but we missed a golden opportunity to take out Little Marco.

[DavidB.]

This is going nowhere. Junk polls!