Hmm, questionable to say the least.
I hate to be a realist 'concern troll', but a poll that shows a suspiciously good picture for Clinton is about as likely to be trash as one that shows a suspiciously good picture for Trump (as in SUSA's NC poll).
Although of course it's possible that, with her ground game, Clinton's suspiciously good polls may turn out to be more accurate than Trump's suspiciously good polls.
I tend to more or less trust SUSA because I'm familiar with their track record though. What's W&M/TargetSmart's record look like?
