absentee/early vote thread, part 2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:36:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  absentee/early vote thread, part 2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: absentee/early vote thread, part 2  (Read 112128 times)
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« on: November 05, 2016, 10:23:57 AM »

It's important to realize that Ralston got half of the competitive elections in 2014 wrong before we start worshipping him
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 02:01:59 PM »

If Clinton loses the election because of NC and MI I could see the democrats pushing for an Australian-style mandatory voting law
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2016, 02:07:41 PM »

All the bed wetting about North Carolina is going to look inane tomorrow.
Given how NC democrats are reliant on AA votes to even be competitive there needs to be a large ED turnout among AA's or she will lose the state and likely take Ross and Cooper
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 02:09:28 PM »

If Clinton loses the election because of NC and MI I could see the democrats pushing for an Australian-style mandatory voting law

I don't think so. These laws are completely ineffective, nobody is going to jail or fine people because they didn't vote. Automatic registration along with soft voter ID, like the West Virginia law, is the way to go.
I just remember some democrats entertaining the idea after 2014, I think making election day a holiday and allowing same day registration would be more effective
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2016, 02:11:17 PM »

All the bed wetting about North Carolina is going to look inane tomorrow.
Given how NC democrats are reliant on AA votes to even be competitive there needs to be a large ED turnout among AA's or she will lose the state and likely take Ross and Cooper
Or she could, as polls have shown, just do better among white voters there.
Those same polls assume AA's make up the same amount of the vote as they did in 2012. This is why Kay Hagan isn't a senator anymore
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 06:26:42 PM »

It's becoming clear why Clinton never invested in Georgia
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 08:18:06 PM »

Wisconsin vote as % of 2012:


Ohio vote as % of 2012:

Wisconsin is solid for Clinton, but ohio looks great for trump
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2016, 08:41:12 PM »

Michael McDonald ‏@ElectProject  3m3 minutes ago
Well, Clinton might have pulled off Ohio. #Earlyvote change from 2012
Cuyahoga +1,052 (+0.4%)
Franklin +22,522 (+10.2%)

How does it compare in % terms?
Also he fails to mention them as comparison to the state as a whole or using party registration returns. This guy is predicting a Clinton win in Iowa, a state they have already given up on
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.