Magellan Strategies - CO: Clinton+6
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 10:16:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Magellan Strategies - CO: Clinton+6
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Magellan Strategies - CO: Clinton+6  (Read 3017 times)
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 03, 2016, 03:15:05 PM »
« edited: November 03, 2016, 03:38:54 PM by Speed of Sound »

Among 500 LVs, Nov 1-2:

Clinton 44 (+4 since mid-October)
Trump 38 (+3)
Johson 7 (-5)
Stein 2 (-3)

http://magellanstrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Magellan-Strategies-Colorado-US-President-Survey-Summary-110316.pdf
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,550
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2016, 03:15:51 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2016, 03:16:49 PM »

Isn't that Rove's outfit? If that is true, Trump gets ed and not proper ed.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2016, 03:17:04 PM »

SMASHING!!!  

Sweet poll!
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2016, 03:17:19 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.

Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2016, 03:18:00 PM »

Wow, nice. Clinton on track to win by high double digits here.
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2016, 03:18:31 PM »

Isn't this a Republican firm?

Yet +6 Clinton?
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2016, 03:18:36 PM »

The firewall stands as strong as ever!  As long as Clinton holds Nevada and Pennsylvania, which seems highly likely, things look very good for her.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 03, 2016, 03:21:00 PM »

Colorado is 100% absentee vote. No chance for a Republican in such a setup.
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2016, 03:23:14 PM »

Colorado is 100% absentee vote. No chance for a Republican in such a setup.

...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Colorado,_2014
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 03, 2016, 03:25:04 PM »


The best imaginable Pub candidate against the disastrous Mark Uterus by just 40k votes.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 03, 2016, 03:28:52 PM »
« Edited: November 03, 2016, 03:33:01 PM by Happy Sad Trumpista »

Isn't this a Republican firm?

Yet +6 Clinton?
Yes it is. Poor Trump.


It is a "C" pollster according to wise white man Nate Silver Smiley
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 03, 2016, 03:31:37 PM »

karl rove is #nevertrump....just sayin'. Wink
Logged
Moderate Pennsylvanian
Rookie
**
Posts: 41


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 03, 2016, 03:32:23 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.

Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.

If you don't know how undecideds will break, then you don't know that her ceiling is around 45%.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 03, 2016, 03:35:05 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.

Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.

If you don't know how undecideds will break, then you don't know that her ceiling is around 45%.

Why would someone willing to vote against Trump not have decided against him by now? What the hell could they possibly be waiting for?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2016, 03:36:04 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.

Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.

If you don't know how undecideds will break, then you don't know that her ceiling is around 45%.

At any rate, if Hillary loses in Colorado, the whole election would have been called for Trump before Colorado is called.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2016, 03:38:31 PM »

Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2016, 03:39:21 PM »

Site's back up. Here's the full data:

http://magellanstrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Magellan-Strategies-Colorado-US-President-Survey-Summary-110316.pdf
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2016, 03:43:04 PM »


Maybe too many Hispanics, but 15% could happen...if they are really THAT motivated. Let's say its like 12-13%... then still Hillary is leading by like 4. 
Logged
Moderate Pennsylvanian
Rookie
**
Posts: 41


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2016, 03:47:39 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.

Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.

If you don't know how undecideds will break, then you don't know that her ceiling is around 45%.

Why would someone willing to vote against Trump not have decided against him by now? What the hell could they possibly be waiting for?

So you're saying you do know how undecideds will break, and they'll all break for Trump. That's ridiculous.
To turn your question around, why would someone willing to vote against Clinton not have decided against her by now? Who knows, but as long as there are undecideds, some will end up voting for Clinton, some for Trump, some for third parties.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2016, 03:51:45 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Methodology seems legit. I think, Trump should be concetrating on other states now, given that 65% has already voted in CO. Though a few addional polls would be nice.
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,711
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2016, 03:52:44 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.

Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.

If you don't know how undecideds will break, then you don't know that her ceiling is around 45%.

Why would someone willing to vote against Trump not have decided against him by now? What the hell could they possibly be waiting for?

So you're saying you do know how undecideds will break, and they'll all break for Trump. That's ridiculous.
To turn your question around, why would someone willing to vote against Clinton not have decided against her by now? Who knows, but as long as there are undecideds, some will end up voting for Clinton, some for Trump, some for third parties.

It's entirely likely many of those undecideds don't vote at all as well, so you can't just automatically assume they're all Trump just because your pessimism is disrupting your ability to use logic.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2016, 03:53:20 PM »

Isn't that Rove's outfit? If that is true, Trump gets ed and not proper ed.

It's not like Rove is going to spin anything for Trump.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2016, 04:01:20 PM »

Looks right. Clinton isn't losing Colorado.
That actually seems plausible. The numbers of people who said that aren't entire sure they will vote is close to the people who say they don't know who they are voting for.
Her ceiling seems to be around 45%. We don't know how undecideds will break, or if Johnson voters switch to Trump on election day.

If you don't know how undecideds will break, then you don't know that her ceiling is around 45%.

Why would someone willing to vote against Trump not have decided against him by now? What the hell could they possibly be waiting for?

So you're saying you do know how undecideds will break, and they'll all break for Trump. That's ridiculous.
To turn your question around, why would someone willing to vote against Clinton not have decided against her by now? Who knows, but as long as there are undecideds, some will end up voting for Clinton, some for Trump, some for third parties.

It's entirely likely many of those undecideds don't vote at all as well, so you can't just automatically assume they're all Trump just because your pessimism is disrupting your ability to use logic.
Logged
mark_twain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 427
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2016, 04:02:18 PM »


Great poll!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 13 queries.