MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 12:50:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5  (Read 25449 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: November 04, 2016, 11:49:56 AM »
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2016, 11:57:21 AM »
Quote from: Jimmie on November 04, 2016, 11:51:46 AM
Quote from: xīngkěruì on November 04, 2016, 11:49:56 AM
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.

Yes, it is time to give up on MO and NC Senate, they are clearly unwinnable due to emails, right?

[/atlas over reacting]

When did I say we should give up on those races? I said that these particular numbers are disappointing, but of course neither race is over.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.