Fox News - Clinton + 2 /Clinton + 1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 02:03:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Fox News - Clinton + 2 /Clinton + 1
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Fox News - Clinton + 2 /Clinton + 1  (Read 3085 times)
mark_twain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 427
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 04, 2016, 05:29:11 PM »

Clinton is definitely doing better than this, for 3 reasons:

1) The poll was taken partly during the Comey "shock" period, which has since then dissipated.

2) Better numbers for early voting.

3) Better ground game for Election Day.


If Fox News is a reliable poll, then I predict a 5% lead in the popular vote for Clinton, after all votes are counted.
Logged
EpicHistory
Rookie
**
Posts: 233
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2016, 05:31:41 PM »

Taken during the height of Comeygate, so that is a bad poll for trump

Dude, I know you Red Hacks are trying your hardest, but this is pathetic.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 04, 2016, 05:32:44 PM »

Taken during the height of Comeygate, so that is a bad poll for trump

Dude, I know you Red Hacks are trying your hardest, but this is pathetic.

I will post this till the cows come home.

We will find out in 4 days.
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,789
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 04, 2016, 05:33:52 PM »

Taken during the height of Comeygate, so that is a bad poll for trump

Dude, I know you Red Hacks are trying your hardest, but this is pathetic.

Absolutely. There is a panic in Brooklyn and it shows here as well. Peak Comeygate was weekend, this poll started tuesday.

I've said it before if the race is tighter than 3pts and it seems it is, nobody knows how EC map will look like. Polling error could go either way but if it goes Trump way, than they should embrace for Trump train on tuesday.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 04, 2016, 05:35:30 PM »
« Edited: November 04, 2016, 05:38:23 PM by Happy Sad Trumpista »

you guys and your peak comeygate thing is really getting silly, stop shilling

Its true though.
What is true?

Yeah. I thought it would be 4-7 Nov. Oh, wait
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2016, 05:40:34 PM »


The 3-5/6 will give us a final look at the electorate, but note that her ground game is off the charts with the EV and she baked in a week of at least +5, another week of at least +3, and there's election day.

Note that Obama won by 4 in 2012 with some national polls showing Romney ahead. No national polls show Romney ahead outside of trackers with heavy R house effect. She's going to win +3-5.
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2016, 05:42:51 PM »

Note of caution - this isn't Fox's last national poll. Hmmm....
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2016, 05:43:10 PM »

The difference is that Obama could win EV losing PV. It is other way around this year. If it TIE or even C+1 (or even C+2 if Trump is extremely lucky), he has a good shot.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2016, 05:44:16 PM »

The difference is that Obama could win EV losing PV. It is other way around this year. If it TIE or even C+1 (or even C+2 if Trump is extremely lucky), he has a good shot.

No, he doesn't. He's failed horrendously at the early vote. We're talking almost 40 million here so far.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2016, 05:45:32 PM »

The difference is that Obama could win EV losing PV. It is other way around this year. If it TIE or even C+1 (or even C+2 if Trump is extremely lucky), he has a good shot.

No, he doesn't. He's failed horrendously at the early vote. We're talking almost 40 million here so far.
Eh, no. EV looks friendly to him.
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2016, 05:47:16 PM »

Dems
Clinton 90%
Trump 4%
Johnson 2%
Stein 1%

GOP
Trump 85%
Clinton 5%
Johnson 4%
Stein 1%

Indies
Trump 41%
Clinton 33%
Johnson 11%
Stein 3%

men: Trump +11
women: Clinton +13
whites: Trump +19
non-whites: Clinton +53
white college degree: Trump +3
white no college degree: Trump +33
urban: Clinton +24
suburban: Clinton +4
rural: Trump +19
under age 35: Clinton +16
age 35-54: Trump +17
age 55+: Clinton +7
under $50k income: Clinton +22
over $50k income: Trump +8


Once again, non-whites are too low here for Clinton. She wins Latino's by 60 and Blacks probably by 80 - no way does the margin hover in the low 50's.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2016, 05:48:05 PM »

The difference is that Obama could win EV losing PV. It is other way around this year. If it TIE or even C+1 (or even C+2 if Trump is extremely lucky), he has a good shot.

No, he doesn't. He's failed horrendously at the early vote. We're talking almost 40 million here so far.
Eh, no. EV looks friendly to him.

What world are you living in? In what important state does the EV look good for him?
Logged
alomas
Rookie
**
Posts: 237
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2016, 05:54:55 PM »

Ohio, Iowa, maybe North Carolina and Florida.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2016, 05:58:38 PM »

Ohio, Iowa, maybe North Carolina and Florida.

Ok, borderline, no and definitely not
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: November 04, 2016, 06:20:23 PM »

2012 redux.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: November 04, 2016, 06:25:08 PM »

The difference is that Obama could win EV losing PV. It is other way around this year. If it TIE or even C+1 (or even C+2 if Trump is extremely lucky), he has a good shot.

No, he doesn't. He's failed horrendously at the early vote. We're talking almost 40 million here so far.
Eh, no. EV looks friendly to him.

What world are you living in? In what important state does the EV look good for him?
EV = elections votes. Obama could win EV losing PV (popular votes), Clinton won't.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: November 04, 2016, 06:44:13 PM »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: November 04, 2016, 06:52:53 PM »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.

^^
Honestly the lies being posted here for self-reassurance are giving me second thoughts on all the other comments that I have taken at face value for the past week or two. She should still win easily, but if I was a Clinton fan, I'd finally just have a tiny ounce of fear. Very tiny. His chances have gone up from about 2% to 8-10%
Logged
Buzz
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,186


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: November 04, 2016, 06:58:06 PM »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.
this lol
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: November 04, 2016, 07:02:51 PM »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.

Yep. Clinton is still likely to win (PV only Tongue), but it becomes so f**king PATHETIC to babble about peak Dickpick.
Logged
m4567
Rookie
**
Posts: 220
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: November 04, 2016, 07:21:16 PM »
« Edited: November 04, 2016, 07:22:59 PM by m4567 »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.

^^
Honestly the lies being posted here for self-reassurance are giving me second thoughts on all the other comments that I have taken at face value for the past week or two. She should still win easily, but if I was a Clinton fan, I'd finally just have a tiny ounce of fear. Very tiny. His chances have gone up from about 2% to 8-10%

I look at state polls and Obama's very slim average national lead going into election day 4 years ago.
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,708
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: November 04, 2016, 07:50:26 PM »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.

Yep. Clinton is still likely to win (PV only Tongue), but it becomes so f**king PATHETIC to babble about peak Dickpick.

How do you see Trump winning the EV?
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: November 04, 2016, 08:10:23 PM »

Uh, guys, peak Comeygate would be the last days of October. First days of November is when the rebound is supposed to have started.

Yep. Clinton is still likely to win (PV only Tongue), but it becomes so f**king PATHETIC to babble about peak Dickpick.

How do you see Trump winning the EV?
I stick to 538 and don't pay that much attention to early voting, which is not that predictive. If it was, why would Clinton camp or CNN/FOX/[write in] spent so much money on polls, amIrite?
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,448
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: November 04, 2016, 08:21:04 PM »

I think our friend dfwlibertylover is looking for more panic and despair from us red avatars. We shouldn't disappoint him, now should we...
OH NO! Hillary is IMPLODING! This poll proves that Trump will be ahead and win on election day! The sky is falling! Fascism will reign supreme! My brain is going to exlpode! AAAAAH!
Better? Tongue

No No I just want people to admit there is not going to be a Clinton landslide

Probably not, but I don't think we can completely rule out a larger than 2012 win for her.

At this point, as long as Clinton wins and Hitler Jr is given the boot, and the Dems have a majority in the Senate, I will be happy.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 14 queries.