Reuters/Ipsos - Clinton + 4 (4 way and 2 way) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 03:23:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Reuters/Ipsos - Clinton + 4 (4 way and 2 way) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reuters/Ipsos - Clinton + 4 (4 way and 2 way)  (Read 952 times)
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« on: November 05, 2016, 07:27:20 PM »

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/2016.Reuters.11.05.16.pdf
Was Clinton + 8 (4way) and  + 6 (2way) 2 days ago

4 way:
Clinton - 43
Trump - 39
Johnson - 6
Stein - 2

2 way:
Clinton - 44
Trump - 40
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2016, 07:32:10 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2016, 07:55:26 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

DFW, stop trying so hard. Most of us realised Reuters was trash at the beginning...
It is like Sean Trende said, it is not the exact number but rather the trend that matters.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2016, 07:58:11 PM »

We have a thread for this. Also, Reuters moves around so much that none of us here actually take it seriously.
I feel like you guys have a wheel of poll excuses that you spin and then reply based on that

DFW, stop trying so hard. Most of us realised Reuters was trash at the beginning...
It is like Sean Trende said, it is not the exact number but rather the trend that matters.

No... the trend is garbage too.
Sad
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 14 queries.