Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 08, 2019, 02:51:08 am
News: 2020 Presidential Predictions (Primary) are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NV: Trafalgar (R) - Trump + 5 (search mode)
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: NV: Trafalgar (R) - Trump + 5  (Read 6003 times)
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,183
United States


« on: November 05, 2016, 11:33:16 pm »

I'm conservative on polling, but I'm very very very confident that EV has already shown where NV is going. This is a hard swing and miss.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,183
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2016, 11:59:18 pm »

When Ralston gets discredited after this election I wonder who becomes the new hero of delusion for the left. Haven't heard much about the great Mark Mellman after he showed Bruce Braley ahead in iowa

It would also "discredit" Michael McDonald, who has called Nevada as "safe Clinton". That'd be literally 2 of the top 3 people who study NV politics "discredited". Go to their numbers and tell me where they're wrong. What thing are they expecting that they shouldn't be?
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,183
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2016, 12:08:13 am »

When Ralston gets discredited after this election I wonder who becomes the new hero of delusion for the left. Haven't heard much about the great Mark Mellman after he showed Bruce Braley ahead in iowa

It would also "discredit" Michael McDonald, who has called Nevada as "safe Clinton". That'd be literally 2 of the top 3 people who study NV politics "discredited". Go to their numbers and tell me where they're wrong. What thing are they expecting that they shouldn't be?
Clinton is probably favored based on early voting, calling it "safe" is delusional. I also love the convenient worship of a man who got half the competitive races wrong in the last election

I asked for a debunk of their math. We don't need Ralston or McDonald to see the numbers from NV, which are ~70% of all that will vote there. Debunk their numbers, not the men.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC