POLITICO/Morning Consult - Clinton +3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 02:52:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  POLITICO/Morning Consult - Clinton +3
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: POLITICO/Morning Consult - Clinton +3  (Read 2544 times)
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,151
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 06, 2016, 06:55:25 AM »

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/politico-morning-consult-poll-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-230818


Clinton    45
Trump     42
Johnson    8
Stein        4

Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,583
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2016, 06:56:22 AM »

The Johnson/Stein numbers are way too high.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2016, 06:57:27 AM »

The Johnson/Stein numbers are way too high.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,151
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2016, 06:57:34 AM »

The Johnson/Stein numbers are way too high.

Yep.  Net net should slightly benefit Trump in the final tactical voting analysis assuming it will end up being something like Johnson 4 Stein 2 but not enough to overcome a 3 point Clinton lead.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,583
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2016, 06:59:43 AM »

The Johnson/Stein numbers are way too high.

Yep.  Net net should slightly benefit Trump in the final tactical voting analysis assuming it will end up being something like Johnson 4 Stein 2 but not enough to overcome a 3 point Clinton lead.

Yep. Though 1% for Stein is more realistic. Johnson at 4% looks about right.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2016, 07:06:35 AM »

I think this is about right.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,151
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2016, 07:18:23 AM »

This poll has been consistently Clinton +6 during pro-Clinton news cycles and Clinton +3 during pro-Trump or neutral news cycles the entire time.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2016, 07:38:12 AM »

This poll hardly ever changes.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,802
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2016, 08:03:22 AM »

This poll has been consistently Clinton +6 during pro-Clinton news cycles and Clinton +3 during pro-Trump or neutral news cycles the entire time.

I think that's actually accurate, to tell you the truth
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2016, 01:54:24 PM »


Same with the YouGov national.  They have both returned Clinton +3 almost continuously since June.

I'd prefer that to CNN, which flips from Trump +5 to Clinton +10 whenever one of them farts too loud.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2016, 01:54:38 PM »

Dems
Clinton 87%
Trump 8%
Johnson 3%
Stein 2%

GOP
Trump 85%
Clinton 9%
Johnson 5%
Stein 1%

Indies
Trump 39%
Clinton 32%
Johnson 17%
Stein 10%

People who support Clinton in the 2-way matchup:
Clinton 93%
Johnson 4%
Stein 3%
Trump 0%

People who support Trump in the 2-way matchup:
Trump 94%
Johnson 4%
Stein 2%
Clinton 1%
(Gotta love that 1% who switch between Clinton and Trump depending on whether you include 3rd parties.)

men: Trump +1
women: Clinton +6
income under $50k: Clinton +5
income $50-100k: Trump +3
income over $100k: Clinton +10
whites: Trump +10
blacks: Clinton +69
Hispanics: Clinton +34
urban: Clinton +29
suburban: Clinton/Trump tie
rural: Trump +19
Midwest: Trump +1
Northeast: Clinton +17
South: Trump +10
West: Clinton +18

So another poll with Clinton leading by more (albeit barely more) in the West than the Northeast, and another one with Trump doing better among those making $50-100k than those making over $100k.  This one even has the rich as Clinton’s strongest income group.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,100
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2016, 01:57:01 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2016, 02:03:04 PM »

fav/unfav %:
Pence 43/36% for +7%
Kaine 34/36% for -2%
Clinton 42/56% for -14%
Johnson 21/35% for -14%
Trump 37/61% for -24%
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,963
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2016, 02:09:51 PM »

fav/unfav %:
Pence 43/36% for +7%
Kaine 34/36% for -2%
Clinton 42/56% for -14%
Johnson 21/35% for -14%
Trump 37/61% for -24%


How in the world does an utter dick like Pence get favorable ratings? That boggles my mind.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2016, 02:11:02 PM »

fav/unfav %:
Pence 43/36% for +7%
Kaine 34/36% for -2%
Clinton 42/56% for -14%
Johnson 21/35% for -14%
Trump 37/61% for -24%


How in the world does an utter dick like Pence get favorable ratings? That boggles my mind.

Dems didn't bother to demonize him since literally nobody cares. Meanwhile, Republicans successfully demonize anyone with a (D) next to their name (muhhhhh likable Kaine!) Same would've happened with Biden/Sanders or Jesus Christ (D).
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2016, 02:12:20 PM »

fav/unfav %:
Pence 43/36% for +7%
Kaine 34/36% for -2%
Clinton 42/56% for -14%
Johnson 21/35% for -14%
Trump 37/61% for -24%


How in the world does an utter dick like Pence get favorable ratings? That boggles my mind.

Dems didn't bother to demonize him since literally nobody cares. Meanwhile, Republicans successfully demonize anyone with a (D) next to their name (muhhhhh likable Kaine!) Same would've happened with Biden/Sanders or Jesus Christ (D).

Republicans didn't need to demonize Kaine.  For anyone watching the VP debate, he did a good job of that all by himself.
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,290
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2016, 02:26:15 PM »

fav/unfav %:
Pence 43/36% for +7%
Kaine 34/36% for -2%
Clinton 42/56% for -14%
Johnson 21/35% for -14%
Trump 37/61% for -24%

Yeah, I personally despise Pence even more than Trump, even though I acknowledge that Pence wouldn't be a threat to the survival of western civilization, which Trump is.
How in the world does an utter dick like Pence get favorable ratings? That boggles my mind.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2016, 02:32:49 PM »

 
The Johnson/Stein numbers are way too high.

Yep.  Net net should slightly benefit Trump in the final tactical voting analysis assuming it will end up being something like Johnson 4 Stein 2 but not enough to overcome a 3 point Clinton lead.

Yep. Though 1% for Stein is more realistic. Johnson at 4% looks about right.

Stein will be lucky to get over 1%, hopefully she won't get even half that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 13 queries.