Bloomberg/Selzer: Clinton +3/+3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:40:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Bloomberg/Selzer: Clinton +3/+3
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bloomberg/Selzer: Clinton +3/+3  (Read 1848 times)
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,799
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2016, 06:15:02 AM »

Clinton 44, Trump 41, Johnson 4, Stein 2
Clinton 46, Trump 43

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-07/national-poll
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 06:16:30 AM »

These undecideds... Jesus. Are they not pushing people at all?
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2016, 06:18:31 AM »

Clinton +25 with Latino's....c'mon folks
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 06:19:44 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2016, 06:22:41 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

Looks their rep is in danger... 36 hours to go until we see.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,799
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 06:33:10 AM »

Full stats:

Clinton favorables: 46/51
Trump favorables: 41/57
POTUS favorables: 54/45
M. Obama favorables: 58/37
Bill Clinton: 50/46
Tim Kaine: 45/37
Mike Pence: 49/39
Paul Ryan: 40/43
VP Biden: 56/38
John Kasich: 37/36

Party ID: 42D/37R/18I
34/58 give new President a chance/keep on fighting
Future of GOP if Trump loses: 30/25/37 for stay the course/moderate/start from scratch
52% think Clinton's presidency will have major scandals
48% think Trump's presidency will have major scandals
53/41 Obama over Trump in a hypothetical election
50/40 Romney over Clinton in a hypothetical election
60% will not watch TrumpTV under any circumstances
7% will definitely watch TrumpTV, 11% will probably watch
2% of Clinton's supporters changed their vote because of Comeygate
Whites: Trump +12
Nonwhites: Clinton +27
Demographics: 70W/11B/10H/3A/4 Other
Gender: 51/49 female/male

Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,611
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 06:37:36 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

They are for Iowa. I don't think they have a long track record of national polling.
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2016, 06:40:36 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

They are for Iowa. I don't think they have a long track record of national polling.

I meant her methodology in general...these non white totals are absurd.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,611
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2016, 06:43:15 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

They are for Iowa. I don't think they have a long track record of national polling.

I meant her methodology in general...these non white totals are absurd.

If they are specialized in polling one of the whitest states in Americe then they don't have much incentive to tweak their methodology to better sample minorities.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2016, 07:00:48 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

They are for Iowa. I don't think they have a long track record of national polling.

I meant her methodology in general...these non white totals are absurd.

She uses voter file in Iowa/Florida. That's why they are good
IDK, if they use it nationally. And if there is national voter file.



But f**k it. I hoped that Trump will close the gap in final national polls. C+3 is too bad for him Sad
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2016, 07:03:52 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

They are for Iowa. I don't think they have a long track record of national polling.

I meant her methodology in general...these non white totals are absurd.

She uses voter file in Iowa/Florida. That's why they are good
IDK, if they use it nationally. And if there is national voter file.



But f**k it. I hoped that Trump will close the gap in final national polls. C+3 is too bad for him Sad

But good for mankind.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2016, 07:05:45 AM »

as we all know, selzer is SUPERTIGHT....so they always play for lown turnout.

good to know that according to them, even if only the likeliest people voted, it would be a tie at worst.
Logged
alomas
Rookie
**
Posts: 237
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2016, 07:33:29 AM »

Clinton +25 with Latino's....c'mon folks
The Latino numbers are all over the place and there is a good chance the Clinton's advantage with them and their share of the electorate in each state will be a key factor.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,151
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2016, 07:57:49 AM »

Generic Congressional vote is GOP +3 in this poll. It seems that GOP is running a good deal ahead of Trump.  If this poll is believed then a good part of Johnson's vote and undecided votes are GOP voters.  This is Trump's last hope.
Logged
Chaddyr23
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: -5.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2016, 08:21:30 AM »

Clinton +37 overall with non-whites...and selzer is supposed to be the gold standard?

They are for Iowa. I don't think they have a long track record of national polling.

I meant her methodology in general...these non white totals are absurd.

She uses voter file in Iowa/Florida. That's why they are good
IDK, if they use it nationally. And if there is national voter file.



But f**k it. I hoped that Trump will close the gap in final national polls. C+3 is too bad for him Sad

But good for mankind.

+1
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 13 queries.