Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2017, 10:48:15 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: AndrewTX, Likely Voter)
| | |-+  Quinnipiac: Clinton +2 in NC, +1 in FL
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Quinnipiac: Clinton +2 in NC, +1 in FL  (Read 1527 times)
heatcharger 🌹‏
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3456
Greenland


Political Matrix
E: -1.54, S: -1.94

View Profile
« on: November 07, 2016, 07:48:00 am »
Ignore

https://poll.qu.edu/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2401

North Carolina:

Clinton 47%
Trump 45%
Johnson 3%

Florida:

Clinton 46%
Trump 45%
Johnson 2%
Logged

Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3673
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 07:49:14 am »
Ignore

Sad
Logged

“People have forgotten this truth," the fox said. "But you mustn’t forget it. You become responsible forever for what you’ve tamed. You’re responsible for your rose.”
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6657
Austria


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2016, 07:49:52 am »
Ignore

it's giving me good vibrations....
Logged

Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3673
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 07:52:05 am »
Ignore

Compared to ther last polls OCT. 27-NOV. 1

Florida: unchaged
NC:       +1 towards Trump




Florida
White 64%
Black 14
Hispanic 16
Other/DK/NA 6


NC
White 67%
Black 20
Hispanic 6
Other/DK/NA 7


Two way:
Florida: TIE
NC:       C+3


Early Voters:
Florda: C+4  (Rubio +2)
NC:      +12
« Last Edit: November 07, 2016, 08:00:07 am by Little Big BREXIT »Logged

“People have forgotten this truth," the fox said. "But you mustn’t forget it. You become responsible forever for what you’ve tamed. You’re responsible for your rose.”
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3237
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2016, 08:00:40 am »

New Poll: Florida President by Quinnipiac University on 2016-11-06

Summary: D: 46%, R: 45%, U: 5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
alomas
Full Member
***
Posts: 185
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 08:00:57 am »
Ignore

We'll see if the black number stays. In 2012 they were 13% in FL now they show 14% in exit poll. Also they show a decrease in whites in NC while there was an increase in early voting.
Logged
Dave Leip
leip
Administrator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3237
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 08:01:42 am »

New Poll: North Carolina President by Quinnipiac University on 2016-11-06

Summary: D: 47%, R: 45%, U: 4%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1781
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2016, 08:04:23 am »
Ignore

I actually think those numbers are semi-bad for Clinton. Was hoping for better. Quinnipiacs last numbers were better for her and her numbers with early voters in Florida doesn't look as good as hoped.
Logged

Pragmatic progressive.
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1899
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

P P

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2016, 08:09:16 am »
Ignore

Incredible! Can't wait to see how unskewing Trump shill liberals hero statistical genius Nate Silver handles these.
Logged

What this election has revealed to me is that our American political factions hold no respect for one another, and that this disrespect has reached the personal level. If we make it through the next four years, I can only pray that our party does something to remedy this, because until we have removed all of our "deplorable" rhetoric from our systems, this nation is hopeless.
Fusionmunster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2493


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2016, 08:10:59 am »
Ignore

I actually think those numbers are semi-bad for Clinton. Was hoping for better. Quinnipiacs last numbers were better for her and her numbers with early voters in Florida doesn't look as good as hoped.

What the heck are you talking about?
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1781
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2016, 08:13:25 am »
Ignore

I actually think those numbers are semi-bad for Clinton. Was hoping for better. Quinnipiacs last numbers were better for her and her numbers with early voters in Florida doesn't look as good as hoped.

What the heck are you talking about?
1) The number are slightly worse than Q's numbers for those two states in early november, even though there is the perception that Clinton has had a slight rebound.

2) The early vote lead in Florida is MoE stuff. We were already expecting Clinton to outpace Trump during early voting, the question was more whether she could get a big enough cushion before election day.
Logged

Pragmatic progressive.
Fusionmunster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2493


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2016, 08:15:12 am »
Ignore

I actually think those numbers are semi-bad for Clinton. Was hoping for better. Quinnipiacs last numbers were better for her and her numbers with early voters in Florida doesn't look as good as hoped.

What the heck are you talking about?
1) The number are slightly worse than Q's numbers for those two states in early november, even though there is the perception that Clinton has had a slight rebound.

2) The early vote lead in Florida is MoE stuff. We were already expecting Clinton to outpace Trump during early voting, the question was more whether she could get a big enough cushion before election day.

Or your looking for negatives where there are none.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3673
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2016, 08:16:44 am »
Ignore

I actually think those numbers are semi-bad for Clinton. Was hoping for better. Quinnipiacs last numbers were better for her and her numbers with early voters in Florida doesn't look as good as hoped.

What the heck are you talking about?
1) The number are slightly worse than Q's numbers for those two states in early november, even though there is the perception that Clinton has had a slight rebound.

2) The early vote lead in Florida is MoE stuff. We were already expecting Clinton to outpace Trump during early voting, the question was more whether she could get a big enough cushion before election day.
By the way according to QU Trump takes 10% of D vs Clinton 7 of Reps.

It is self-reported though, but one can get a clue Tongue


And among early voters:
Presideent DK/NA 6%
Senate      DK/NA 4%
2% that say who they voted in senate, doesn't say whom the they voted for in president race Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: November 07, 2016, 08:20:29 am by Little Big BREXIT »Logged

“People have forgotten this truth," the fox said. "But you mustn’t forget it. You become responsible forever for what you’ve tamed. You’re responsible for your rose.”
HokeyDood
HockeyDude
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10572
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2016, 08:19:08 am »
Ignore

POSITIVELY SENSATIONAL!!!
Logged

Help Intervention beloved poster Little Big Trumpista so he stops boofing drugs.  Click here!  http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=profile;u=14196 
This is life or death. 



Registering for Atlas After Dark is a can of corn!
http://atlasafterdark.freeforums.net/
Ozymandias
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2016, 11:42:35 am »
Ignore

https://poll.qu.edu/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2401

FLORIDA

Of the 65% (575/884) of respondents who said they voted early:

Clinton - 47
Trump - 43
Johnson - 2
Stein - 0
Other - 1

Rubio - 48
Murphy - 46
Other - 2

NORTH CAROLINA

Of the 67% (583/884) of respondents who said they voted early:

Clinton - 52
Trump - 40
Johnson - 2
Other - 2

Ross - 51
Burr - 43
Other - 2

Cooper - 56
McCrory - 40
Other - 1


 
Logged
Ozymandias
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2016, 11:45:53 am »
Ignore

2) The early vote lead in Florida is MoE stuff. We were already expecting Clinton to outpace Trump during early voting, the question was more whether she could get a big enough cushion before election day.

Actually, there are enough  early voters now that their MOW isn't much less than the overall MOE.

And you're right, this poll has a lower EV lead for Clinton than several other Florida polls.

But I guess the upside is that if they are under-predicting her EV lead, then she'll have an even bigger overall lead than she does now...
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3673
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2016, 11:51:46 am »
Ignore

And you're right, this poll has a lower EV lead for Clinton than several other Florida polls.

But I guess the upside is that if they are under-predicting her EV lead, then she'll have an even bigger overall lead than she does now...
Which means that that poll has a lower ED lead for Trump than several other Florida polls.

But I guess the upside is that if they are under-predicting his ED lead, then he'll have an even bigger overall lead than he does now...

It works both ways, you know Roll Eyes
Logged

“People have forgotten this truth," the fox said. "But you mustn’t forget it. You become responsible forever for what you’ve tamed. You’re responsible for your rose.”
xīngkěruì
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11262
Taiwan


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2016, 12:20:27 pm »
Ignore

Clinton should win both, though I do think NC will be closer.
Logged

Ozymandias
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2016, 12:44:01 pm »
Ignore

And you're right, this poll has a lower EV lead for Clinton than several other Florida polls.

But I guess the upside is that if they are under-predicting her EV lead, then she'll have an even bigger overall lead than she does now...
Which means that that poll has a lower ED lead for Trump than several other Florida polls.

But I guess the upside is that if they are under-predicting his ED lead, then he'll have an even bigger overall lead than he does now...

It works both ways, you know Roll Eyes

But surely you see the advantage of Clinton having votes banked and going into Election Day already having a lead?  Especially when she's the one with the better ground game than Trump?
Logged
Devout Centrist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4516
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.45, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2016, 12:50:55 pm »
Ignore

Good news everyone!
Logged

You are so partial that your opinion is worth little.
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3673
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2016, 01:09:13 pm »
Ignore

But surely you see the advantage of Clinton having votes banked and going into Election Day already having a lead?
 
Yes, it is true.
But on other hand if Clinton was so good on turning in "unlikely" voters, she'd grow in polls, right? That's not what we seen so far; polls on average shows the same picture as before/at the start of EV, Trump's probably even gained a bit.

Except national polls. They are bringing are very dark news for Trump. And I am the one who relies more heavily on national polls trends Sad

And I'm actually very worried that after today's Clinton +4-7, some Reps won't turn up + polls missing Hispanics Sad

Especially when she's the one with the better ground game than Trump?
My opinion has always been that ground-game is
a) highly overrated
b) partly backed-in in polls (specially when so many EV:ed)

Clinton's best asset has always been Trump (females and Hispanics).
Logged

“People have forgotten this truth," the fox said. "But you mustn’t forget it. You become responsible forever for what you’ve tamed. You’re responsible for your rose.”
Absolution9
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 99


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2016, 01:15:41 pm »
Ignore

https://poll.qu.edu/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2401

FLORIDA

Of the 65% (575/884) of respondents who said they voted early:

Clinton - 47
Trump - 43
Johnson - 2
Stein - 0
Other - 1

Rubio - 48
Murphy - 46
Other - 2

NORTH CAROLINA

Of the 67% (583/884) of respondents who said they voted early:

Clinton - 52
Trump - 40
Johnson - 2
Other - 2

Ross - 51
Burr - 43
Other - 2

Cooper - 56
McCrory - 40
Other - 1


 

So in the presidential race only 92% of Florida respondents and 94% of NC respondent (who claimed they already voted) were willing to tell who they voted for.  That means that there is a pretty good bit of uncertainty in the result, with respect to how this block actually voted.
Logged
Ozymandias
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: November 07, 2016, 01:26:24 pm »
Ignore

https://poll.qu.edu/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2401

FLORIDA

Of the 65% (575/884) of respondents who said they voted early:

Clinton - 47
Trump - 43
Johnson - 2
Stein - 0
Other - 1

Rubio - 48
Murphy - 46
Other - 2

NORTH CAROLINA

Of the 67% (583/884) of respondents who said they voted early:

Clinton - 52
Trump - 40
Johnson - 2
Other - 2

Ross - 51
Burr - 43
Other - 2

Cooper - 56
McCrory - 40
Other - 1


 

So in the presidential race only 92% of Florida respondents and 94% of NC respondent (who claimed they already voted) were willing to tell who they voted for.  That means that there is a pretty good bit of uncertainty in the result, with respect to how this block actually voted.

If you include "Other" and rounding errors it's actually 94% of FL EV and 96% of NC EV, but yes, that's right-- there's consistently a few % of EVs who don't reveal who they voted for.

As I've said before, I really don't understand why they don't just throw these non-respondents out of the poll. (Perhaps it's because they did respond to SEN or GOV candidate questions?)
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines