US presidential electons where the party in power should've won/lost, but didn't (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:52:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  US presidential electons where the party in power should've won/lost, but didn't (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US presidential electons where the party in power should've won/lost, but didn't  (Read 892 times)
m4567
Rookie
**
Posts: 220
« on: November 17, 2016, 06:47:54 PM »
« edited: November 17, 2016, 06:49:45 PM by m4567 »
Should've lost: 1876


Should've won: 1960, 2000




They were controversial elections, too.



Any more?
Logged
m4567
Rookie
**
Posts: 220
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2016, 09:09:52 AM »
« Edited: November 18, 2016, 09:12:12 AM by m4567 »
Quote from: Dereich on November 17, 2016, 08:44:34 PM
What are your criteria here for "should have won/lost"? Poll numbers? The status of the economy? It's hard to decide who should have won or lost something when we're all using different standards of what should make someone win.

Not polling, but the overall perception.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.