Describe a Mexican transwoman Trump voter

[Thunderbird is the word]

go!

[Bigby]

A Mexican transwoman who was born here and was brutally attacked by a Muslim.

[Kingpoleon]

Ted Cruz?

[Enduro]

I don't like these "describe a voter" threads. You literally just described the voter, we're just adding context.

[Pheurton Skeurto]

Imaginary

[Mr. Reactionary]

A Republican

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Maybe someone who is really opposed to transgenderism and only became a woman as a weird way to make a point.

[Xing]

Anti-Muslim, votes purely based on abortion, her family came here legally, so she assumes anyone who didn't is a lazy dirty criminal-rapist.

[White Trash]

A fully assimilated fourth or fifth generation American with only her surname tying her to Mexico who was impressed by Trump's stance regarding Caitlyn Jenner.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

Ted Cruz?

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

[Maxwell]

Probably someone like CCSF.

[White Trash]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

This too

[Thunderbird is the word]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

Reminds me of some gay kid I knew who was the heir to some old money fortune and during the 2012 election would be the only one in class enthusiastically defending Romney.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

Reminds me of some gay kid I knew who was the heir to some old money fortune and during the 2012 election would be the only one in class enthusiastically defending Romney.

For a brief period in 2008 and 2009 I went to the same college as a certain one-term upstate New York Republican Congresswoman's son. This is exactly what he was like. I have personal beef with him for unrelated reasons.

[Crumpets]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

Agreed, although I'd say "privileged" rather than rich. The kind of person whose life is going really well, and gets annoyed that someone who ostensibly has the same background as them is "complaining" about prejudice.

[Hydera]

I know one online. She's very cynical and nihilistic and most of her daily interactions is with internet memes since she visits 4chan a lot. Said she dislikes trump's policies but would stomach him because he pisses so many people off(AKA:make liberals "butthurt") and sjws.  She goes into "so what?" when i tell her those two are pro-LGBT.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Maybe someone who is really opposed to transgenderism and only became a woman as a weird way to make a point.

That's not a transwoman,

[Laeta]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

That's why rich people massively swung towards Hillary this election, amirite?

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

That's why rich people massively swung towards Hillary this election, amirite?

Trump still won them, and they didn't swing Clinton because of race, gender identity, etc.

[Laeta]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

That's why rich people massively swung towards Hillary this election, amirite?

Trump still won them, and they didn't swing Clinton because of race, gender identity, etc.

No he didn't

According to exit polls, Donald Trump won them by 1 point (compared to Romney winning them by 10 points in 2012), however exit polls are junk. Exit polls have been disproven several times.

The wealthiest areas in America all massively swung Clinton. Clinton crushed Trump in wealthy communities that Romney narrowly won/lost in 2012 like Darien, New Canaan, Atherton, NoVA, Georgia suburbs, DuPage county, Woodside, etc.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Simple: she's rich. Rich people (contrary to the beliefs of the naive SJWs) typically harbour no solidarity for their race, sexuality, or gender identity, especially if any solidarity could hamper their ability to make money.

That's why rich people massively swung towards Hillary this election, amirite?

Trump still won them, and they didn't swing Clinton because of race, gender identity, etc.

No he didn't

According to exit polls, Donald Trump won them by 1 point (compared to Romney winning them by 10 points in 2012), however exit polls are junk. Exit polls have been disproven several times.

The wealthiest areas in America all massively swung Clinton. Clinton crushed Trump in wealthy communities that Romney narrowly won/lost in 2012 like Darien, New Canaan, Atherton, NoVA, Georgia suburbs, DuPage county, Woodside, etc.

Swinging hard towards democrats doesnt neccesarily mean won by democrats. Many wealthy suburbs did swing Clinton, but that doesn't mean Clinton won wealthy voters everywhere. Exit polls being bad doesn't mean your conclusion that contradicts them is automatically right.

[Thank you for being a friend...]

Caitlin Jenner Sanchez.

[Figueira]

Well, there were plenty of Mexican-Americans who voted for Trump (mostly assimilated ones) and there were also some trans people who voted for him, so I wouldn't be surprised if there was some overlap between the two.