Atlas Free Radio - Averroes Part 3! - PLUS: Science Silenced! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:43:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Atlas Free Radio - Averroes Part 3! - PLUS: Science Silenced! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Atlas Free Radio - Averroes Part 3! - PLUS: Science Silenced!  (Read 11404 times)
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,516


« on: December 30, 2016, 11:23:00 AM »

Wow nice. Great job Baconking.

I may be interested in doing one on a path to House Victory I see for Democrats in 2018. I literally went state by state. It is tough, but doable.

Certainly not as tough as it would  have been for Democrats to take the house in 2012 or 2014 in a neutral or lean dem environment. Smiley
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,516


« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2017, 08:11:08 PM »

I am doing a second one quite soon. I was a bit rushed at the end as policy proosals to solve this issue can not be discussed in five minutes.

So the second one will be on policy proposals.

But ultimately automation causes labor disruption and not necessarily a net job loss.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,516


« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2017, 02:30:51 AM »

I really enjoyed the most recent episode. May I ask that when you do your part II, there be a question about the minimum wage in relation to automation, as it has been at the forefront of the argument against raising it. Thanks!

Thank you!

I am hoping I am more coherent in the second half.

And yes the minimum wage discussion will be included on this one.

It is sort of looking like this in the outline right now:

1. Hot take or Junk Poll
2. Main Topic: Solutions to Automation
A) Could conservatives be right about minimum wage and regulation [to an extent maybe and this will obviously be short)
B) proposal on tax on technology? [maybe to a small extent but it could backfire with outsourcing]
C) Universal Basic Income [how do you fund it???]
D) Education/Training. Shift yourself with the job market.
E) Best solution (We will pick)
3. Junk Poll, Low Energy Loser, or Resistance Report


I honestly want to cut the hot take/junk poll and the last part off and just focus on the solutions. It takes a long time to discuss. Automation impacting or "destroying" jobs will certainly be a more persuasive issue going forward but I think the impact on job loss is way overblown.

I do not think we should fear raising the minimum wage based on robots taking low level positions because 1) Automation is coming, 2) these industries often demand a humanized touch and 3) businesses may be put in a catch 22. If everything is automated they save money but there are less people with jobs and thus less people able to purchase their goods.

With that I could already seeing conservatives argue against any form of universal basic income as they would say, "it would encourage companies to automate more and put more people out of work"

And of course this issue also can be awkward to cruel to discuss. Think of how disheartened some people could be, often through unfortunate life circumstances, of being told that they have to be paid a low wage or they could lose their job to a robot! Paying someone minimum wage is is basically saying you want to pay that employee less but you can not because it is illegal.

Tax on technology and businesses.. could back fire if business put their headquarters overseas.

I think right now the best solution is to just deal with it and go with the flow and depend on education and training to access new positions. 

I mean just a simple google search brings up this: http://theundercoverrecruiter.com/jobs-didnt-exist/

But it is worth noting those positions are less numerous compared to taco bell cashiers.

This is an issue governments just are not prepared to deal with and overblown or not it will have to be dealt with.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,516


« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2017, 03:34:51 AM »

Lol, Wagner is overrated but McCaskill isn't? The McCaskill cult just won't shut the hell up.

She is not an unbeatable titan and never has really had to face a competitive race. Though I do agree she would be a strong candidate against McCaskill than Hawley.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_zzqEA9N2A

And even if a candidate is over rated it does not mean they will lose. Blunt was overrated and Kander was underrated early in the campaign but Blunt still won and Kander still lost at the end.

and the second half may be entirely related to automation to evade something like this.

And perhaps Wagner would be the front runner to the US Senate with no question if her staff and her self would actually respond to her damn constituents.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,516


« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2017, 04:18:11 AM »

Lol, Wagner is overrated but McCaskill isn't? The McCaskill cult just won't shut the hell up.

     Kind of hard to make the case McCaskill is overrated when we constantly hear about how she is going to get Blanched.

Naw, she'll merely get Claired out of office.

There has not been a single public poll of her versus random Republicans yet. Let's hold our horses first.

You are just scared of a strong female senator.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.