Which are the fairer assessments of the election? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 28, 2024, 01:23:47 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Election Archive

2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Which are the fairer assessments of the election? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

#1 The Republican Party won in spite of their nominee being Trump		42 (37.2%)
#2 Donald Trump in spite of being a Republican		45 (39.8%)
#3 The Democrats lost because of Hillary		86 (76.1%)
#4 Hillary lost because of the Democrats		16 (14.2%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 113

Calculate results by number of options selected

Author

Topic: Which are the fairer assessments of the election? (Read 2014 times)

100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon

Posts: 11,717

Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57

	Re: Which are the fairer assessments of the election? « on: January 21, 2017, 12:39:25 PM »
	« edited: January 21, 2017, 05:21:32 PM by ExtremeRepublican »

The Republicans won in spite of our nominee. The only state Trump flipped that Walker or Rubio (Generic R) wouldn't have was Michigan. But, Generic R would have also won Minnesota, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, and maybe Maine and New Mexico. Rubio would have had a chance at a landslide, only losing California, Hawaii, Washington, Maryland, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts, and DC.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.