Which are the fairer assessments of the election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:25:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which are the fairer assessments of the election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
The Republican Party won in spite of their nominee being Trump
 
#2
Donald Trump in spite of being a Republican
 
#3
The Democrats lost because of Hillary
 
#4
Hillary lost because of the Democrats
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 113

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which are the fairer assessments of the election?  (Read 2022 times)
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« on: January 06, 2017, 07:18:23 AM »

As much as I acknowledge Trump has outperformed for someone of his persona, this was a GOP year. I am thoroughly unconvinced that only Trump could have pulled it off when a hard-core conservative like Ernst wins by 8 points in Iowa.

Kasich would have likely carried rural Midwest by a bigger margin and wouldn't have needed a huge late break from undecideds to win. Anyone who carries OH by 13 probably is carrying WI, MI, and rural PA by a good margin as well. He would have won the popular vote.

Cruz would have probably done no worse than Trump. It isn't as if he hasn't talked about securing borders or repealing Obamacare. He also would have appealed just as much to evangelicals with his promise on Supreme Court justice.

This election was beyond just rejection of Hillary or "establishment". Look at McGinty and Feingold. They did no better than her.

Agreed.

We were coming off two terms of a Democratic president. The GOP took both chambers of congress by an earthslide in 2014. The economy wasn't great. Obama's approval ratings were in the 40s before the election season started. Anti-incumbent and and anti-establishment fervor was sky high.

The Democrats, the media, and Hillary herself were kidding and deluding themselves all the way to Tuesday night. Geopolitical undercurrents are far stronger than the candidates on the ballot, pure and simple.

And before anybody replies "But she won the popular vote!!"...just take a look at the swing/trend maps from 2012. My point is still valid.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 16 queries.